Re: Patch(?): bash-2.05/jobs.c loses interrupts

2001-05-01 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > Linux-2.4.4 has a change, for which I must accept blame, > > where fork() runs the child first, reducing unnecessary copy-on-write > > page duplications, because the child will usually promptly do an > > exec(). I understand this is pretty standard in most unixes. > > > > Peter

Re: Patch(?): bash-2.05/jobs.c loses interrupts

2001-04-30 Thread Adam J. Richter
>> Linux-2.4.4 has a change, for which I must accept blame, >> where fork() runs the child first, reducing unnecessary copy-on-write >> page duplications, because the child will usually promptly do an >> exec(). I understand this is pretty standard in most unixes. >> >> Peter Osterlund

Re: Patch(?): bash-2.05/jobs.c loses interrupts

2001-04-30 Thread Chet Ramey
> Linux-2.4.4 has a change, for which I must accept blame, > where fork() runs the child first, reducing unnecessary copy-on-write > page duplications, because the child will usually promptly do an > exec(). I understand this is pretty standard in most unixes. > > Peter Osterlund not

Patch(?): bash-2.05/jobs.c loses interrupts

2001-04-28 Thread Adam J. Richter
Linux-2.4.4 has a change, for which I must accept blame, where fork() runs the child first, reducing unnecessary copy-on-write page duplications, because the child will usually promptly do an exec(). I understand this is pretty standard in most unixes. Peter Osterlund noticed an