Thank you Jeff for your very helpfull answer.
--- Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: >
Cesar Da Silva wrote:
> > * Alternative I/O Pathing
>
> be less vague
What I mean with the above (my defenition) is:
[Alternative I/O Pathing allows the operating system
to re-route the I/O of devices,
--- Ville Herva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
skrev: > > > * Dynamic Memory Resilience
> >
> > RAM fault tolerance? There was a patch a long
> time ago which detected
> > bad ram, and would mark those memory clusters as
> unuseable at boot.
> > However that is clearly not dynamic.
>
> If you are
--- Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > On
Sun, 27 May 2001, [iso-8859-1] Cesar Da Silva
> wrote:
>
> > I am doing a thesis about comparing the Linux
> kernel
> > against HP-UX, AIX, Tru64 UNIX, and Solaris (as
> you
> > probably alredy know).
> > I'm stuck now (and the thesis has to bee
On Sun, 27 May 2001, [iso-8859-1] Cesar Da Silva wrote:
> I am doing a thesis about comparing the Linux kernel
> against HP-UX, AIX, Tru64 UNIX, and Solaris (as you
> probably alredy know).
> I'm stuck now (and the thesis has to bee ready until
> tomorow)
Aren't you the same guy who posted this
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 10:27:09PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > * Service Location Protocol (SLP)
www.openslp.org
Regards
Ingo Oeser
--
To the systems programmer,
users and applications serve only to provide a test load.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Sat, 26 May 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Cesar Da Silva wrote:
> > The features that I'm wondering about are:
> > * Dynamic Processor Resilience
>
> is this fault tolerance? I think if a CPU croaks, you are dead.
>
> There are patches for hot swap cpu support, but I haven't seen any CPU
>
On Sat, 26 May 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Cesar Da Silva wrote:
The features that I'm wondering about are:
* Dynamic Processor Resilience
is this fault tolerance? I think if a CPU croaks, you are dead.
There are patches for hot swap cpu support, but I haven't seen any CPU
fault
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 10:27:09PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
* Service Location Protocol (SLP)
www.openslp.org
Regards
Ingo Oeser
--
To the systems programmer,
users and applications serve only to provide a test load.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
On Sun, 27 May 2001, [iso-8859-1] Cesar Da Silva wrote:
I am doing a thesis about comparing the Linux kernel
against HP-UX, AIX, Tru64 UNIX, and Solaris (as you
probably alredy know).
I'm stuck now (and the thesis has to bee ready until
tomorow)
Aren't you the same guy who posted this
--- Rik van Riel [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev: On
Sun, 27 May 2001, [iso-8859-1] Cesar Da Silva
wrote:
I am doing a thesis about comparing the Linux
kernel
against HP-UX, AIX, Tru64 UNIX, and Solaris (as
you
probably alredy know).
I'm stuck now (and the thesis has to bee ready
until
--- Ville Herva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
skrev:* Dynamic Memory Resilience
RAM fault tolerance? There was a patch a long
time ago which detected
bad ram, and would mark those memory clusters as
unuseable at boot.
However that is clearly not dynamic.
If you are referring to Badram
Thank you Jeff for your very helpfull answer.
--- Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
Cesar Da Silva wrote:
* Alternative I/O Pathing
be less vague
What I mean with the above (my defenition) is:
[Alternative I/O Pathing allows the operating system
to re-route the I/O of devices, such
Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
> >> * Live Upgrade
> >
> >LOBOS will let one Linux kernel boot another, but that requires a boot
> >step, so it is not a live upgrade. so, no, afaik
>
> If you build nearly everything (except, obviously what you need to boot) as
> modules, you can unload modules,
>> * Live Upgrade
>
>LOBOS will let one Linux kernel boot another, but that requires a boot
>step, so it is not a live upgrade. so, no, afaik
If you build nearly everything (except, obviously what you need to boot) as
modules, you can unload modules, build new versions, and reload them. So,
Cesar Da Silva wrote:
> The features that I'm wondering about are:
> * Dynamic Processor Resilience
is this fault tolerance? I think if a CPU croaks, you are dead.
There are patches for hot swap cpu support, but I haven't seen any CPU
fault tolerance patches that can handle a dead processor
>
Hi again.
I am doing a thesis about comparing the Linux kernel
against HP-UX, AIX, Tru64 UNIX, and Solaris (as you
probably alredy know).
I'm stuck now (and the thesis has to bee ready until
tomorow) with some few features that the other
operating system have, and I can't find any
information
Hi again.
I am doing a thesis about comparing the Linux kernel
against HP-UX, AIX, Tru64 UNIX, and Solaris (as you
probably alredy know).
I'm stuck now (and the thesis has to bee ready until
tomorow) with some few features that the other
operating system have, and I can't find any
information
Cesar Da Silva wrote:
The features that I'm wondering about are:
* Dynamic Processor Resilience
is this fault tolerance? I think if a CPU croaks, you are dead.
There are patches for hot swap cpu support, but I haven't seen any CPU
fault tolerance patches that can handle a dead processor
*
* Live Upgrade
LOBOS will let one Linux kernel boot another, but that requires a boot
step, so it is not a live upgrade. so, no, afaik
If you build nearly everything (except, obviously what you need to boot) as
modules, you can unload modules, build new versions, and reload them. So,
you
Jonathan Morton wrote:
* Live Upgrade
LOBOS will let one Linux kernel boot another, but that requires a boot
step, so it is not a live upgrade. so, no, afaik
If you build nearly everything (except, obviously what you need to boot) as
modules, you can unload modules, build new
20 matches
Mail list logo
