> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:05:02 -0700
> From: Todd Poynor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> David Brownell wrote:
> > Interesting. I start to like this shape better; it moves more of the
> > logic to operating point code, where it can make the sysfs interface
> > talk in terms of meaningful abstractions,
David Brownell wrote:
Interesting. I start to like this shape better; it moves more of the
logic to operating point code, where it can make the sysfs interface
talk in terms of meaningful abstractions, not cryptic numeric offsets.
But it was odd to see the first patch be platform-specific suppor
Interesting. I start to like this shape better; it moves more of the
logic to operating point code, where it can make the sysfs interface
talk in terms of meaningful abstractions, not cryptic numeric offsets.
But it was odd to see the first patch be platform-specific support,
rather than be a neut
PowerOP support for OMAP1 platforms. Currently handles these power
parameters:
dpllmult DPLL_CTL reg PLL MULT bits
dplldiv DPLL_CTL reg PLL DIV bits
armdiv ARM_CKCTL reg ARMDIV bits
dspdiv ARM_CKCTL reg DSPDIV bits
tcdivARM_CKCTL reg TCDIV bits
lowpw
4 matches
Mail list logo