Hi,
I guess there are no simple answers... Below I have 3 different answers to
my
previous questions. As they relate to the same problem,I descided to put
them togheter in this mail.
Mark Hahn don't realy seams to agree with Andre about if noapic is
crippling
the system or not.
Alan Cox says
Hi,
I guess there are no simple answers... Below I have 3 different answers to
my
previous questions. As they relate to the same problem,I descided to put
them togheter in this mail.
Mark Hahn don't realy seams to agree with Andre about if noapic is
crippling
the system or not.
Alan Cox says
Hi Andre,
The motherboard has VIA-chipset.
What does this mean for me?
Will the APIC-problems be solved in the future or do I have to deside upon
running "noapic" semi-crippled or not run Ultra-DMA?
_\\|//_
(-0-0-)
Hi Andre,
The motherboard has VIA-chipset.
What does this mean for me?
Will the APIC-problems be solved in the future or do I have to deside upon
running noapic semi-crippled or not run Ultra-DMA?
_\\|//_
(-0-0-)
:: If this is a VIA SMP system there are APIC problems that you
:: do not want
:: to even think about addressing.
::
:: MPS1.1 and passing "noapic" will fix most of there mess, but
:: you have a
:: semi-crippled system, but it runs.
Andre,
I don't suppose these APIC problems are documented
If this is a VIA SMP system there are APIC problems that you do not want
to even think about addressing.
MPS1.1 and passing "noapic" will fix most of there mess, but you have a
semi-crippled system, but it runs.
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi once more...
>
> I'm sorry for
Hi once more...
I'm sorry for the layout of this mail. It is written in a web mail
system...
The attachements are in ASCII format even if the web-mail make it base-64
Now I have compiled a vanilla 2.2.19 kernel and have SMP working, without
Ultra-DMA. I used the functional kernel config from
Hi again,
Earlier today I wrote about my SMP and Ultra-DMA problem. Now have I
written
down the boot information. I hope that the attachment show the correct
information, it was written in W*rd so some lower case chars can have been
converted into upper case...
I also checked the IDE-patch and
PROTECTED]
From: Magnus Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problem with kernel 2.2.19 Ultra-DMA and SMP
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 13:55:02 +0200
Hi,
I need some help with Linux kernel 2.2.19. I added Andre Hidrick's IDE-patch
to get Ultra-DMA for my IDE disk. That kernel has worked for a
PROTECTED]
From: Magnus Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem with kernel 2.2.19 Ultra-DMA and SMP
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 13:55:02 +0200
Hi,
I need some help with Linux kernel 2.2.19. I added Andre Hidrick's IDE-patch
to get Ultra-DMA for my IDE disk. That kernel has worked for a month
Hi again,
Earlier today I wrote about my SMP and Ultra-DMA problem. Now have I
written
down the boot information. I hope that the attachment show the correct
information, it was written in W*rd so some lower case chars can have been
converted into upper case...
I also checked the IDE-patch and
Hi once more...
I'm sorry for the layout of this mail. It is written in a web mail
system...
The attachements are in ASCII format even if the web-mail make it base-64
Now I have compiled a vanilla 2.2.19 kernel and have SMP working, without
Ultra-DMA. I used the functional kernel config from
If this is a VIA SMP system there are APIC problems that you do not want
to even think about addressing.
MPS1.1 and passing noapic will fix most of there mess, but you have a
semi-crippled system, but it runs.
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi once more...
I'm sorry for the
13 matches
Mail list logo
