On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 06:10:08AM +, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2015 09:52 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Perhaps you're not removing the BRK instruction properly, and so you try to
> > single-step a trapping instruction and end up stepping into the exception?
>
> No, probably t
On Friday 16 January 2015 09:52 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:00:09PM +, Pratyush Anand wrote:
On Thursday 15 January 2015 10:17 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
On Tuesday 13 January 2015 11:23 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
I will still try to find some way to capture enable_db
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:00:09PM +, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> On Thursday 15 January 2015 10:17 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > On Tuesday 13 January 2015 11:23 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> >> I will still try to find some way to capture enable_dbg macro path.H
> >
> > I did instrumented debug tap
Sorry for writing so many mails...But I have one more closer information
which could help to further explain the behavior. See below.
On Friday 16 January 2015 05:30 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
Hi Will,
On Thursday 15 January 2015 10:17 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
Hi Will / Catalin,
On Tuesda
Hi Will,
On Thursday 15 January 2015 10:17 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
Hi Will / Catalin,
On Tuesday 13 January 2015 11:23 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
I will still try to find some way to capture enable_dbg macro path.H
I did instrumented debug tap points at all the location from where
enable_d
Hi Will / Catalin,
On Tuesday 13 January 2015 11:23 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
I will still try to find some way to capture enable_dbg macro path.H
I did instrumented debug tap points at all the location from where
enable_debug macro is called(see attached debug patch). But, I do not
see that
On Tuesday 13 January 2015 09:22 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 06:46:36AM +, Pratyush Anand wrote:
On Monday 12 January 2015 11:00 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 05:13:29PM +, Pratyush Anand wrote:
On Friday 09 January 2015 09:16 PM, Will Deacon w
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 06:46:36AM +, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> On Monday 12 January 2015 11:00 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 05:13:29PM +, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> >> On Friday 09 January 2015 09:16 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:28:37PM +, Pr
On Monday 12 January 2015 11:00 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 05:13:29PM +, Pratyush Anand wrote:
On Friday 09 January 2015 09:16 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:28:37PM +, Pratyush Anand wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2015 09:53 PM, Will Deacon wr
On 01/12/2015 12:30 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 05:13:29PM +, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Friday 09 January 2015 09:16 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:28:37PM +, Pratyush Anand wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2015 09:53 PM, Will Deacon wro
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 05:13:29PM +, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>
>
> On Friday 09 January 2015 09:16 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:28:37PM +, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> >> On Thursday 08 January 2015 09:53 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 01:15:58PM +
On Friday 09 January 2015 09:16 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:28:37PM +, Pratyush Anand wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2015 09:53 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 01:15:58PM +, Pratyush Anand wrote:
I am trying to test following scenario, which seems
12 matches
Mail list logo
