Well, I stand corrected. Look forward to trying it out.
--Jauder
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Jauder Ho wrote:
> > I am not sure what you intend this application for. If it is mission
> > critical in any way shape or form, I would still recommend
Well, I stand corrected. Look forward to trying it out.
--Jauder
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Jauder Ho wrote:
I am not sure what you intend this application for. If it is mission
critical in any way shape or form, I would still recommend using
Hi,
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Jauder Ho wrote:
> I am not sure what you intend this application for. If it is mission
> critical in any way shape or form, I would still recommend using something
> like Veritas (which unfortunately is not ported to Linux yet).
Tom Sightler wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm seeking information in regards to a large Linux implementation we are
> planning. We have been evaluating many storage options and I've come up
> with some questions that I have been unable to answer as far as Linux
> capabilities in regards to storage.
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Jesse Pollard wrote:
> james rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Tom Sightler wrote:
> >
> > > 2. Does linux have any problems with large (500GB+) NFS exports, how about
> > > large files over NFS?
> > >
> > > 3. What filesystem would be best for such large
james rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Tom Sightler wrote:
>
> > 2. Does linux have any problems with large (500GB+) NFS exports, how about
> > large files over NFS?
> >
> > 3. What filesystem would be best for such large volumes? We currently use
> > reirserfs on our internal
james rich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Tom Sightler wrote:
2. Does linux have any problems with large (500GB+) NFS exports, how about
large files over NFS?
3. What filesystem would be best for such large volumes? We currently use
reirserfs on our internal system, but
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Jesse Pollard wrote:
james rich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Tom Sightler wrote:
2. Does linux have any problems with large (500GB+) NFS exports, how about
large files over NFS?
3. What filesystem would be best for such large volumes? We
Tom Sightler wrote:
Hi All,
I'm seeking information in regards to a large Linux implementation we are
planning. We have been evaluating many storage options and I've come up
with some questions that I have been unable to answer as far as Linux
capabilities in regards to storage.
We
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Tom Sightler wrote:
> 2. Does linux have any problems with large (500GB+) NFS exports, how about
> large files over NFS?
>
> 3. What filesystem would be best for such large volumes? We currently use
> reirserfs on our internal system, but they generally have filesystems
Tom Sightler wrote:
> ...
> For example if we purchase a NetApp Filer, or EMC Celerra with 1TB of
> storage, and elect to export that entire amount as a single NFS mount, and
> then use that storage to allow several Linux boxes to share 100GB
> (admittedly temporary) files, will Linux handle
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Tom Sightler wrote:
> The questions that have been asked are as follows (assume 2.4.x kernels):
>
> 1. What is the largest block device that linux currently supports? i.e.
> Can I create a single 1TB volume on my storage device and expect linux to
> see it and be able to
> >1. What is the largest block device that linux currently supports? i.e.
> >Can I create a single 1TB volume on my storage device and expect linux to
> >see it and be able to format it?
>
> Checkout the GFS project for really large filesystems with a high
capability
> of "fail safe"
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Jesse Pollard wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Mar 2001, Tom Sightler wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I'm seeking information in regards to a large Linux implementation we are
> >planning. We have been evaluating many storage options and I've come up
> >with some questions that I have been
On Wed, 07 Mar 2001, Tom Sightler wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I'm seeking information in regards to a large Linux implementation we are
>planning. We have been evaluating many storage options and I've come up
>with some questions that I have been unable to answer as far as Linux
>capabilities in regards
Hi All,
I'm seeking information in regards to a large Linux implementation we are
planning. We have been evaluating many storage options and I've come up
with some questions that I have been unable to answer as far as Linux
capabilities in regards to storage.
We are looking at storage systems
Hi All,
I'm seeking information in regards to a large Linux implementation we are
planning. We have been evaluating many storage options and I've come up
with some questions that I have been unable to answer as far as Linux
capabilities in regards to storage.
We are looking at storage systems
On Wed, 07 Mar 2001, Tom Sightler wrote:
Hi All,
I'm seeking information in regards to a large Linux implementation we are
planning. We have been evaluating many storage options and I've come up
with some questions that I have been unable to answer as far as Linux
capabilities in regards to
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Jesse Pollard wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2001, Tom Sightler wrote:
Hi All,
I'm seeking information in regards to a large Linux implementation we are
planning. We have been evaluating many storage options and I've come up
with some questions that I have been unable to
1. What is the largest block device that linux currently supports? i.e.
Can I create a single 1TB volume on my storage device and expect linux to
see it and be able to format it?
Checkout the GFS project for really large filesystems with a high
capability
of "fail safe" configuration.
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Tom Sightler wrote:
The questions that have been asked are as follows (assume 2.4.x kernels):
1. What is the largest block device that linux currently supports? i.e.
Can I create a single 1TB volume on my storage device and expect linux to
see it and be able to format
Tom Sightler wrote:
...
For example if we purchase a NetApp Filer, or EMC Celerra with 1TB of
storage, and elect to export that entire amount as a single NFS mount, and
then use that storage to allow several Linux boxes to share 100GB
(admittedly temporary) files, will Linux handle that, at
22 matches
Mail list logo
