Jose de la Mancha wrote:
Hi everyone. I'm sorry but I'm not currently subscribed to this list (I've
been sent here by the listmaster), so please CC me all your
answers/comments. Thanks in advance.
SHORT QUESTION :
In a Debian-controlled RAID array, is there a parameter that handles the
timeout
Thanasis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 12/31/2007 11:54 AM Jose de la Mancha wrote the following:
>> --> All RAID edition drives are more expensive that their equivalent
>> "desktop edition" drives (same model on "desktop edition"). Just take a look
>> at newegg for instance.
>>
Thanasis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 12/31/2007 11:54 AM Jose de la Mancha wrote the following:
-- All RAID edition drives are more expensive that their equivalent
desktop edition drives (same model on desktop edition). Just take a look
at newegg for instance.
Jose de la Mancha wrote:
Hi everyone. I'm sorry but I'm not currently subscribed to this list (I've
been sent here by the listmaster), so please CC me all your
answers/comments. Thanks in advance.
SHORT QUESTION :
In a Debian-controlled RAID array, is there a parameter that handles the
timeout
Jose de la Mancha wrote:
[]
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> Not sure about Debian, but perhaps /sys/block/md0/md/safe_mode_delay
>> does something?
>
> --> I'll check that out. Does someone know about how this "safe mode delay"
> works ?
It's about something entirely different. This parameter tells
on 12/31/2007 11:54 AM Jose de la Mancha wrote the following:
>
> --> All RAID edition drives are more expensive that their equivalent
> "desktop edition" drives (same model on "desktop edition"). Just take a look
> at newegg for instance.
>
Thanks guys for your answers (please remember to keep CCing me).
Robert Hancock wrote:
> This always seemed a strange use case to me. If the drive is getting
> read errors, either it's dying and needs to be replaced, or it has a
> sporadic bad sector as a result of a power failure during write,
Thanks guys for your answers (please remember to keep CCing me).
Robert Hancock wrote:
This always seemed a strange use case to me. If the drive is getting
read errors, either it's dying and needs to be replaced, or it has a
sporadic bad sector as a result of a power failure during write, etc.
on 12/31/2007 11:54 AM Jose de la Mancha wrote the following:
-- All RAID edition drives are more expensive that their equivalent
desktop edition drives (same model on desktop edition). Just take a look
at newegg for instance.
Jose de la Mancha wrote:
[]
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Not sure about Debian, but perhaps /sys/block/md0/md/safe_mode_delay
does something?
-- I'll check that out. Does someone know about how this safe mode delay
works ?
It's about something entirely different. This parameter tells md after
on 12/31/2007 12:42 AM Jose de la Mancha wrote the following:
>
> Of course there are "RAID edition" hard drives with a feature called TLER
> (Time Limited Error Recovery) which stops the hard drive from entering into
> a deep recovery cycle. The hard drive will only spend 7 seconds to attempt
>
On Dec 30 2007 23:42, Jose de la Mancha wrote:
>SHORT QUESTION :
>In a Debian-controlled RAID array, is there a parameter that handles the
>timeout before a non-responding drive is dropped from the array ? Can this
>timeout become user-adjustable in a future build ?
Not sure about Debian,
but
Jose de la Mancha wrote:
Hi everyone. I'm sorry but I'm not currently subscribed to this list (I've
been sent here by the listmaster), so please CC me all your
answers/comments. Thanks in advance.
SHORT QUESTION :
In a Debian-controlled RAID array, is there a parameter that handles the
timeout
Hi everyone. I'm sorry but I'm not currently subscribed to this list (I've
been sent here by the listmaster), so please CC me all your
answers/comments. Thanks in advance.
SHORT QUESTION :
In a Debian-controlled RAID array, is there a parameter that handles the
timeout before a non-responding
Hi everyone. I'm sorry but I'm not currently subscribed to this list (I've
been sent here by the listmaster), so please CC me all your
answers/comments. Thanks in advance.
SHORT QUESTION :
In a Debian-controlled RAID array, is there a parameter that handles the
timeout before a non-responding
Jose de la Mancha wrote:
Hi everyone. I'm sorry but I'm not currently subscribed to this list (I've
been sent here by the listmaster), so please CC me all your
answers/comments. Thanks in advance.
SHORT QUESTION :
In a Debian-controlled RAID array, is there a parameter that handles the
timeout
On Dec 30 2007 23:42, Jose de la Mancha wrote:
SHORT QUESTION :
In a Debian-controlled RAID array, is there a parameter that handles the
timeout before a non-responding drive is dropped from the array ? Can this
timeout become user-adjustable in a future build ?
Not sure about Debian,
but
on 12/31/2007 12:42 AM Jose de la Mancha wrote the following:
Of course there are RAID edition hard drives with a feature called TLER
(Time Limited Error Recovery) which stops the hard drive from entering into
a deep recovery cycle. The hard drive will only spend 7 seconds to attempt
to
18 matches
Mail list logo
