Please do not top-post.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hello Ben,
Regarding the code snippet;
Good question, The original code didn't do this either, which is why I left it
as it is. It could cause undesirable behaviour, agreed.
After a quick driver examination: I do see that asix_set_sw_mii and
asix_set_hw_mii are called prior to the actual
Hello Ben,
Regarding the code snippet;
Good question, The original code didn't do this either, which is why I left it
as it is. It could cause undesirable behaviour, agreed.
After a quick driver examination: I do see that asix_set_sw_mii and
asix_set_hw_mii are called prior to the actual
Please do not top-post.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 20:09 +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:23:06AM +0100, Stam, Michel [FINT] wrote:
> > Hello Riku,
> >
> > >Fixing a bug (ethtool support) must not cause breakage elsewhere (in
> > this case on arndale). This is now a regression of functionality from
>
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 20:09 +, Charles Keepax wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:23:06AM +0100, Stam, Michel [FINT] wrote:
Hello Riku,
Fixing a bug (ethtool support) must not cause breakage elsewhere (in
this case on arndale). This is now a regression of functionality from
3.17.
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 01:39:07PM +0100, Stam, Michel [FINT] wrote:
> Hello Riku and Charles,
>
> I tried this with my original patch and the suggested patch applied,
> this seems to work for me too.
>
> One thing that bothers me, is the suspend / resume situation; usbnet.c
> seems to call the
Hello Riku and Charles,
I tried this with my original patch and the suggested patch applied,
this seems to work for me too.
One thing that bothers me, is the suspend / resume situation; usbnet.c
seems to call the bind( ) on probe( ). Suspend / resume do not seem to
call bind( ) directly.
As
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 10:01:04AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 11:06:51AM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > The asix on arndale comes semi-configured from u-boot, which I guess is
> > not the state kernel expects it to come in. At least in my case where
> > I use tftp from
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 11:06:51AM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 03:02:58PM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 01:04:37PM +0100, Stam, Michel [FINT] wrote:
> > > Hello Charles,
> > >
> > > After looking around I found the reset value for the 8772 chip,
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 03:02:58PM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 01:04:37PM +0100, Stam, Michel [FINT] wrote:
> > Hello Charles,
> >
> > After looking around I found the reset value for the 8772 chip, which
> > seems to be 0x1E1 (ANAR register).
> >
> > This equates to
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 03:02:58PM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 01:04:37PM +0100, Stam, Michel [FINT] wrote:
Hello Charles,
After looking around I found the reset value for the 8772 chip, which
seems to be 0x1E1 (ANAR register).
This equates to (according to
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 11:06:51AM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 03:02:58PM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 01:04:37PM +0100, Stam, Michel [FINT] wrote:
Hello Charles,
After looking around I found the reset value for the 8772 chip, which
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 10:01:04AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 11:06:51AM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
The asix on arndale comes semi-configured from u-boot, which I guess is
not the state kernel expects it to come in. At least in my case where
I use tftp from u-boot
Hello Riku and Charles,
I tried this with my original patch and the suggested patch applied,
this seems to work for me too.
One thing that bothers me, is the suspend / resume situation; usbnet.c
seems to call the bind( ) on probe( ). Suspend / resume do not seem to
call bind( ) directly.
As
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 01:39:07PM +0100, Stam, Michel [FINT] wrote:
Hello Riku and Charles,
I tried this with my original patch and the suggested patch applied,
this seems to work for me too.
One thing that bothers me, is the suspend / resume situation; usbnet.c
seems to call the bind( )
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:23:06AM +0100, Stam, Michel [FINT] wrote:
> Hello Riku,
>
> >Fixing a bug (ethtool support) must not cause breakage elsewhere (in
> this case on arndale). This is now a regression of functionality from
> 3.17.
> >
> >I think it would better to revert the change now and
Hello Riku,
>Fixing a bug (ethtool support) must not cause breakage elsewhere (in
this case on arndale). This is now a regression of functionality from
3.17.
>
>I think it would better to revert the change now and with less hurry
introduce a ethtool fix that doesn't break arndale.
I don't fully
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:19:26AM +0100, Stam, Michel [FINT] wrote:
> Interesting, as the commit itself is a revert from a kernel back to 2.6
> somewhere. The problem I had is related to the PHY being reset on
> interface-up, can you confirm that you require this?
I can't confirm what exactly is
Hello Riku,
Interesting, as the commit itself is a revert from a kernel back to 2.6
somewhere. The problem I had is related to the PHY being reset on
interface-up, can you confirm that you require this? Reverting this
breaks ethtool support in turn.
Kind regards,
Michel Stam
-Original
Hello Riku,
Interesting, as the commit itself is a revert from a kernel back to 2.6
somewhere. The problem I had is related to the PHY being reset on
interface-up, can you confirm that you require this? Reverting this
breaks ethtool support in turn.
Kind regards,
Michel Stam
-Original
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:19:26AM +0100, Stam, Michel [FINT] wrote:
Interesting, as the commit itself is a revert from a kernel back to 2.6
somewhere. The problem I had is related to the PHY being reset on
interface-up, can you confirm that you require this?
I can't confirm what exactly is
Hello Riku,
Fixing a bug (ethtool support) must not cause breakage elsewhere (in
this case on arndale). This is now a regression of functionality from
3.17.
I think it would better to revert the change now and with less hurry
introduce a ethtool fix that doesn't break arndale.
I don't fully
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:23:06AM +0100, Stam, Michel [FINT] wrote:
Hello Riku,
Fixing a bug (ethtool support) must not cause breakage elsewhere (in
this case on arndale). This is now a regression of functionality from
3.17.
I think it would better to revert the change now and with less
24 matches
Mail list logo
