RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/1] timecounter: Make cyclecounter struct part of timecounter struct

2018-01-05 Thread Brown, Aaron F
.@linutronix.de>; > kvm...@lists.cs.columbia.edu; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/1] timecounter: Make cyclecounter > struct part of timecounter struct > > On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 10:01 +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: &

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/1] timecounter: Make cyclecounter struct part of timecounter struct

2018-01-05 Thread Brown, Aaron F
r.kernel.org; Richard Cochran ; > Stephen Boyd ; Chris Wilson wilson.co.uk>; John Stultz ; intel-wired- > l...@lists.osuosl.org; Thomas Gleixner ; > kvm...@lists.cs.columbia.edu; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/1] timecounter: Make cycle

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/1] timecounter: Make cyclecounter struct part of timecounter struct

2017-12-06 Thread Jeff Kirsher
On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 10:01 +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: > There is no real need for the users of timecounters to define > cyclecounter > and timecounter variables separately. Since timecounter will always > be > based on cyclecounter, have cyclecounter struct as member of > timecounter >

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/1] timecounter: Make cyclecounter struct part of timecounter struct

2017-12-06 Thread Jeff Kirsher
On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 10:01 +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: > There is no real need for the users of timecounters to define > cyclecounter > and timecounter variables separately. Since timecounter will always > be > based on cyclecounter, have cyclecounter struct as member of > timecounter >