RE: [PATCH] mm, oom: normalize the adj to ensure oom_badness return a positive number

On Tue, 4 Mar 2014, He, Bo wrote: > Sorry, the title is confusing. Change it to: mm, oom: normalize the adj to > ensure oom_badness returns a positive number There's something seriously wrong with your email client, it's not replying correctly to threads so this appears as a completely new

RE: [PATCH] mm, oom: normalize the adj to ensure oom_badness return a positive number

On Tue, 4 Mar 2014, He, Bo wrote: Sorry, the title is confusing. Change it to: mm, oom: normalize the adj to ensure oom_badness returns a positive number There's something seriously wrong with your email client, it's not replying correctly to threads so this appears as a completely new

RE: [PATCH] mm, oom: normalize the adj to ensure oom_badness return a positive number

Sorry, the title is confusing. Change it to: mm, oom: normalize the adj to ensure oom_badness returns a positive number We are enabling android mobiles. When running stress memory test, there is a bad issue. Some critical processes such as Healthd and watchdogd are killed, while some other

RE: [PATCH] mm, oom: normalize the adj to ensure oom_badness return a positive number

Sorry, the title is confusing. Change it to: mm, oom: normalize the adj to ensure oom_badness returns a positive number We are enabling android mobiles. When running stress memory test, there is a bad issue. Some critical processes such as Healthd and watchdogd are killed, while some other