> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl-sai: using 'lsb-first' property instead of
> 'big-endian-data'.
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:53:56PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
>
> > That's why I suggested previously: mention it in the commit comment.
>
> > People will have
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:53:56PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> That's why I suggested previously: mention it in the commit comment.
> People will have no idea about what's the exact reason for this change.
> Any functional enhancement? Or a bug fix(more likely for this one).
> I'm not sure what
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl-sai: using 'lsb-first' property instead of
> 'big-endian-data'.
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:12 PM, li.xi...@freescale.com
> wrote:
> > > > This property used for configuring whether the LSB or the MSB is
> transmitted
&
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:12 PM, li.xi...@freescale.com
wrote:
> > > This property used for configuring whether the LSB or the MSB is
> > > transmitted
> > > first for the fifo data.
> >
> > I don't follow the rationale for this change.
> >
> > This looks like a pointless renaming.
> >
> > Why
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:12 PM, li.xi...@freescale.com
li.xi...@freescale.com wrote:
This property used for configuring whether the LSB or the MSB is
transmitted
first for the fifo data.
I don't follow the rationale for this change.
This looks like a pointless renaming.
Why
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl-sai: using 'lsb-first' property instead of
'big-endian-data'.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:12 PM, li.xi...@freescale.com
li.xi...@freescale.com wrote:
This property used for configuring whether the LSB or the MSB is
transmitted
first for the fifo data
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:53:56PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
That's why I suggested previously: mention it in the commit comment.
People will have no idea about what's the exact reason for this change.
Any functional enhancement? Or a bug fix(more likely for this one).
I'm not sure what I
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl-sai: using 'lsb-first' property instead of
'big-endian-data'.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:53:56PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
That's why I suggested previously: mention it in the commit comment.
People will have no idea about what's the exact reason
lsa-
> project.org; ga...@codeaurora.org; robh...@kernel.org; Pawel Moll; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl-sai: using 'lsb-first' property instead of
> 'big-endian-data'.
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 08:16:01AM +0100, Xiubo Li wrote:
> >
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 08:16:01AM +0100, Xiubo Li wrote:
> This property used for configuring whether the LSB or the MSB is transmitted
> first for the fifo data.
I don't follow the rationale for this change.
This looks like a pointless renaming.
Why is this any better?
Thanks,
Mark.
>
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 08:16:01AM +0100, Xiubo Li wrote:
This property used for configuring whether the LSB or the MSB is transmitted
first for the fifo data.
I don't follow the rationale for this change.
This looks like a pointless renaming.
Why is this any better?
Thanks,
Mark.
...@codeaurora.org; robh...@kernel.org; Pawel Moll; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl-sai: using 'lsb-first' property instead of
'big-endian-data'.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 08:16:01AM +0100, Xiubo Li wrote:
This property used for configuring whether the LSB or the MSB
12 matches
Mail list logo
