Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: don't sleep in atomic context

2017-12-28 Thread Pankaj Dubey
Hi Jingoo, On 12/21/2017 10:09 PM, Jingoo Han wrote: > On Thursday, October 12, 2017 3:55 AM, Pankaj Dubey wrote: >> In pcie-designware.c many places we are calling "usleep_range" which >> are in atomic context. This patch fixes these potential BUGs and >> replaces "usleep_range" with mdelay

Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: don't sleep in atomic context

2017-12-28 Thread Pankaj Dubey
Hi Jingoo, On 12/21/2017 10:09 PM, Jingoo Han wrote: > On Thursday, October 12, 2017 3:55 AM, Pankaj Dubey wrote: >> In pcie-designware.c many places we are calling "usleep_range" which >> are in atomic context. This patch fixes these potential BUGs and >> replaces "usleep_range" with mdelay

Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: don't sleep in atomic context

2017-12-21 Thread Jingoo Han
On Thursday, October 12, 2017 3:55 AM, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > > In pcie-designware.c many places we are calling "usleep_range" which > are in atomic context. This patch fixes these potential BUGs and > replaces "usleep_range" with mdelay calls. > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey

Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: don't sleep in atomic context

2017-12-21 Thread Jingoo Han
On Thursday, October 12, 2017 3:55 AM, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > > In pcie-designware.c many places we are calling "usleep_range" which > are in atomic context. This patch fixes these potential BUGs and > replaces "usleep_range" with mdelay calls. > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey Sorry for my late

Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: don't sleep in atomic context

2017-11-06 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 01:19:17PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:10:38AM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > > > > > > On 10/12/2017 04:09 PM, David Laight wrote: > > >From: Pankaj Dubey > > >>Sent: 12 October 2017 08:55 > > >>In pcie-designware.c many places we are calling

Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: don't sleep in atomic context

2017-11-06 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 01:19:17PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:10:38AM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > > > > > > On 10/12/2017 04:09 PM, David Laight wrote: > > >From: Pankaj Dubey > > >>Sent: 12 October 2017 08:55 > > >>In pcie-designware.c many places we are calling

RE: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: don't sleep in atomic context

2017-10-23 Thread David Laight
From: Bjorn Helgaas > Sent: 20 October 2017 19:19 > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:10:38AM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > > > > > > On 10/12/2017 04:09 PM, David Laight wrote: > > >From: Pankaj Dubey > > >>Sent: 12 October 2017 08:55 > > >>In pcie-designware.c many places we are calling "usleep_range"

RE: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: don't sleep in atomic context

2017-10-23 Thread David Laight
From: Bjorn Helgaas > Sent: 20 October 2017 19:19 > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:10:38AM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > > > > > > On 10/12/2017 04:09 PM, David Laight wrote: > > >From: Pankaj Dubey > > >>Sent: 12 October 2017 08:55 > > >>In pcie-designware.c many places we are calling "usleep_range"

Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: don't sleep in atomic context

2017-10-20 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:10:38AM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > > > On 10/12/2017 04:09 PM, David Laight wrote: > >From: Pankaj Dubey > >>Sent: 12 October 2017 08:55 > >>In pcie-designware.c many places we are calling "usleep_range" which > >>are in atomic context. This patch fixes these

Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: don't sleep in atomic context

2017-10-20 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:10:38AM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > > > On 10/12/2017 04:09 PM, David Laight wrote: > >From: Pankaj Dubey > >>Sent: 12 October 2017 08:55 > >>In pcie-designware.c many places we are calling "usleep_range" which > >>are in atomic context. This patch fixes these

Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: don't sleep in atomic context

2017-10-12 Thread Pankaj Dubey
On 10/12/2017 04:09 PM, David Laight wrote: From: Pankaj Dubey Sent: 12 October 2017 08:55 In pcie-designware.c many places we are calling "usleep_range" which are in atomic context. This patch fixes these potential BUGs and replaces "usleep_range" with mdelay calls. Signed-off-by: Pankaj

Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: don't sleep in atomic context

2017-10-12 Thread Pankaj Dubey
On 10/12/2017 04:09 PM, David Laight wrote: From: Pankaj Dubey Sent: 12 October 2017 08:55 In pcie-designware.c many places we are calling "usleep_range" which are in atomic context. This patch fixes these potential BUGs and replaces "usleep_range" with mdelay calls. Signed-off-by: Pankaj

RE: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: don't sleep in atomic context

2017-10-12 Thread David Laight
From: Pankaj Dubey > Sent: 12 October 2017 08:55 > In pcie-designware.c many places we are calling "usleep_range" which > are in atomic context. This patch fixes these potential BUGs and > replaces "usleep_range" with mdelay calls. > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey > ---

RE: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: don't sleep in atomic context

2017-10-12 Thread David Laight
From: Pankaj Dubey > Sent: 12 October 2017 08:55 > In pcie-designware.c many places we are calling "usleep_range" which > are in atomic context. This patch fixes these potential BUGs and > replaces "usleep_range" with mdelay calls. > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey > --- >