On 8/23/2017 2:06 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 03:55:53PM +0530, Imran Khan wrote:
>> khungtask by default monitors either all tasks or no tasks at all
>> for long unterruptible sleeps.
>> For Android like environments this arrangement is not optimal because
>> on one hand
On 8/23/2017 2:06 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 03:55:53PM +0530, Imran Khan wrote:
>> khungtask by default monitors either all tasks or no tasks at all
>> for long unterruptible sleeps.
>> For Android like environments this arrangement is not optimal because
>> on one hand
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 03:55:53PM +0530, Imran Khan wrote:
> khungtask by default monitors either all tasks or no tasks at all
> for long unterruptible sleeps.
> For Android like environments this arrangement is not optimal because
> on one hand it may be permissible to have some background(bg)
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 03:55:53PM +0530, Imran Khan wrote:
> khungtask by default monitors either all tasks or no tasks at all
> for long unterruptible sleeps.
> For Android like environments this arrangement is not optimal because
> on one hand it may be permissible to have some background(bg)
Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>;
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nos...@oracle.com>; Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>; John Siddle <jsid...@redhat.com>; open
list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; open list:PROC SYSCTL
<linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org&g
e (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) ;
mi...@kernel.org
Cc: imrank140...@gmail.com; Luis R. Rodriguez ; Kees Cook
; Peter Zijlstra (Intel) ; Matt
Fleming ; Andrew Morton ;
Vegard Nossum ; Tetsuo Handa
; John Siddle ; open
list ; open list:PROC SYSCTL
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: hung task: Check spe
On 8/22/2017 7:24 AM, Zhang, Shile (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) wrote:
> Hi, Imran,
>
Hi Shile,
Thanks for getting back on this.
> I think a "unmonitored list" is better than "monitor list", because we want
> khungtaskd can find out the "unexpected" hung task, but not few in a list.
> Then, for the fg
On 8/22/2017 7:24 AM, Zhang, Shile (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) wrote:
> Hi, Imran,
>
Hi Shile,
Thanks for getting back on this.
> I think a "unmonitored list" is better than "monitor list", because we want
> khungtaskd can find out the "unexpected" hung task, but not few in a list.
> Then, for the fg
Hi, Imran,
I think a "unmonitored list" is better than "monitor list", because we want
khungtaskd can find out the "unexpected" hung task, but not few in a list.
Then, for the fg tasks, which can put it in the "unmonitored list", for the bg
tasks, I think we can tweak the timeout to control the
Hi, Imran,
I think a "unmonitored list" is better than "monitor list", because we want
khungtaskd can find out the "unexpected" hung task, but not few in a list.
Then, for the fg tasks, which can put it in the "unmonitored list", for the bg
tasks, I think we can tweak the timeout to control the
10 matches
Mail list logo
