uxarm ; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> Roman Gushchin ; Catalin Marinas
> ; Will Deacon ; Thomas Gleixner
> ; Ingo Molnar ; Borislav Petkov
> ; H . Peter Anvin ; Mike Kravetz
> ; Mike Rapoport ; Jonathan
> Cameron
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: split hugetlb_cma in node
Hello Barry,
On 07/08/2020 05:53 AM, Barry Song wrote:
> Rather than splitting huge_cma in online nodes, it is better to do it in
> nodes with memory.
Right, it makes sense to avoid nodes without memory, hence loosing portions
of CMA reservation intended for HugeTLB. N_MEMORY is better than
2 matches
Mail list logo
