> From: John Garry
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2019 12:00 PM
>
> On 15/02/2019 11:25, Salil Mehta wrote:
> >> From: John Garry
> >> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2019 10:52 AM
> >>
> >> On 14/02/2019 06:41, Huang Zijiang wrote:
> >>> The of_find_device_by_node() takes a reference to the underlying
On 15/02/2019 11:25, Salil Mehta wrote:
From: John Garry
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2019 10:52 AM
On 14/02/2019 06:41, Huang Zijiang wrote:
The of_find_device_by_node() takes a reference to the underlying device
structure, we should release that reference.
of_find_device_by_node() is not
> From: John Garry
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2019 10:52 AM
>
> On 14/02/2019 06:41, Huang Zijiang wrote:
> > The of_find_device_by_node() takes a reference to the underlying device
> > structure, we should release that reference.
>
> of_find_device_by_node() is not called for every path, so
On 14/02/2019 06:41, Huang Zijiang wrote:
The of_find_device_by_node() takes a reference to the underlying device
structure, we should release that reference.
of_find_device_by_node() is not called for every path, so is this change
proper:
/* find the platform device corresponding
From: Huang Zijiang
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:41:45 +0800
> The of_find_device_by_node() takes a reference to the underlying device
> structure, we should release that reference.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Zijiang
Applied, thank you.
5 matches
Mail list logo