Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: add the config GPIO_OUTPUT_x

2014-03-14 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Linus, > > For the nature of this feature, I would like to have your clear advice > as this is needed and has been proposed twice (at least). This feature > is needed for power management states of GPIOs. It seems that this is aligned with

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: add the config GPIO_OUTPUT_x

2014-03-12 Thread Boris BREZILLON
; pawel.m...@arm.com; ijc+devicet...@hellion.org.uk; linus.wall...@linaro.org; Linux Kernel list; b.brezil...@overkiz.com; robh...@kernel.org; ga...@codeaurora.org; mailing list; Lin, JM Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: add the config GPIO_OUTPUT_x On Mar 11, 2014, at 2:54 PM, Yang, Wenyou wrote

RE: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: add the config GPIO_OUTPUT_x

2014-03-12 Thread Yang, Wenyou
com; > ijc+devicet...@hellion.org.uk; linus.wall...@linaro.org; Linux Kernel > list; b.brezil...@overkiz.com; robh...@kernel.org; ga...@codeaurora.org; > mailing list; Lin, JM > Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: add the config GPIO_OUTPUT_x > > > On Mar 11

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: add the config GPIO_OUTPUT_x

2014-03-11 Thread Nicolas Ferre
On 05/03/2014 02:53, Wenyou Yang : > In order to support the pinctrl sleep state. > > Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang Wenyou, This patch has been discussed here: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-August/194975.html I even gave my Acknowledgement on Boris' patch. Can you ple

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: add the config GPIO_OUTPUT_x

2014-03-11 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
RD; mark.rutl...@arm.com; >> devicet...@vger.kernel.org; pawel.m...@arm.com; >> ijc+devicet...@hellion.org.uk; linus.wall...@linaro.org; Linux Kernel >> list; b.brezil...@overkiz.com; robh...@kernel.org; ga...@codeaurora.org; >> mailing list >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinc

RE: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: add the config GPIO_OUTPUT_x

2014-03-10 Thread Yang, Wenyou
com; > ijc+devicet...@hellion.org.uk; linus.wall...@linaro.org; Linux Kernel > list; b.brezil...@overkiz.com; robh...@kernel.org; ga...@codeaurora.org; > mailing list > Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: add the config GPIO_OUTPUT_x > > > On Mar 11, 2014, at 9:2

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: add the config GPIO_OUTPUT_x

2014-03-10 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
gt; ker...@lists.infradead.org> mailing list; Linux Kernel list; >> devicet...@vger.kernel.org; robh...@kernel.org; pawel.m...@arm.com; >> mark.rutl...@arm.com; ijc+devicet...@hellion.org.uk; >> ga...@codeaurora.org >> Subject: RE: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: add the config GPIO_

RE: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: add the config GPIO_OUTPUT_x

2014-03-10 Thread Yang, Wenyou
vger.kernel.org; robh...@kernel.org; pawel.m...@arm.com; > mark.rutl...@arm.com; ijc+devicet...@hellion.org.uk; > ga...@codeaurora.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: add the config GPIO_OUTPUT_x > > Hi JC, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jean-Christ

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: add the config GPIO_OUTPUT_x

2014-03-04 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On Mar 5, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Wenyou Yang wrote: > In order to support the pinctrl sleep state. As I said before NACK this is not the job of the pinctrl to describe gpio output or input state Best Regards, J. > > Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang > --- > Hi Linus, > > The patch is based on branch:

RE: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: add the config GPIO_OUTPUT_x

2014-03-04 Thread Yang, Wenyou
st; Linux Kernel list; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; robh...@kernel.org; > pawel.m...@arm.com; mark.rutl...@arm.com; ijc+devicet...@hellion.org.uk; > ga...@codeaurora.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: add the config GPIO_OUTPUT_x > > > On Mar 5, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Wenyou