On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Patrick Farrell wrote:
> Peng,
>
> I'm sorry to say, this patch was reverted due to interoperability problems
> with 2.1 servers (This either a slightly later [but still broken] version of
> the patch we discussed recently, or the same one.). If Greg's accepted
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Patrick Farrell p...@cray.com wrote:
Peng,
I'm sorry to say, this patch was reverted due to interoperability problems
with 2.1 servers (This either a slightly later [but still broken] version of
the patch we discussed recently, or the same one.). If Greg's
Peng,
I'm sorry to say, this patch was reverted due to interoperability problems with
2.1 servers (This either a slightly later [but still broken] version of the
patch we discussed recently, or the same one.). If Greg's accepted this
upstream (and it looks like he has), it'll have to be
Peng,
I'm sorry to say, this patch was reverted due to interoperability problems with
2.1 servers (This either a slightly later [but still broken] version of the
patch we discussed recently, or the same one.). If Greg's accepted this
upstream (and it looks like he has), it'll have to be
4 matches
Mail list logo
