>Koenig, Christian
>Subject: RE: [PATCH 07/83] drm/radeon: Add kfd-->kgd interface of locking
>srbm_gfx_cntl register
>
>Checking... we shouldn't need to call the lock from kfd any more.We should
>be able to do any required locking in radeon kgd code.
Confirmed. The lock
, 2014 1:48 PM
>To: 'Jerome Glisse'; Oded Gabbay
>Cc: David Airlie; Deucher, Alexander; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; dri-
>de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Lewycky, Andrew; Joerg Roedel; Gabbay, Oded;
>Koenig, Christian
>Subject: RE: [PATCH 07/83] drm/radeon: Add kfd-->kgd in
avid Airlie; Deucher, Alexander; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; dri-
>de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Bridgman, John; Lewycky, Andrew; Joerg
>Roedel; Gabbay, Oded; Koenig, Christian
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/83] drm/radeon: Add kfd-->kgd interface of locking
>srbm_gfx_cntl register
>
>On Fr
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:50:07AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> This patch adds a new interface to kfd2kgd_calls structure, which
> allows the kfd to lock and unlock the srbm_gfx_cntl register
Why does kfd needs to lock this register if kfd can not access
any of those register ? This sounds broken
4 matches
Mail list logo
