On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:20 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 07:12:09PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > Oops. Sorry, the correct sub-sub-sub-sub-paragraph is this one:
> >
> > Permission to execute a file.
> >
> > Servers SHOULD allow a user the
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 07:12:09PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Oops. Sorry, the correct sub-sub-sub-sub-paragraph is this one:
>
> Permission to execute a file.
>
> Servers SHOULD allow a user the ability to read the data of the
> file when only the
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 07:12:09PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
Oops. Sorry, the correct sub-sub-sub-sub-paragraph is this one:
Permission to execute a file.
Servers SHOULD allow a user the ability to read the data of the
file when only the ACE4_EXECUTE
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:20 PM, J. Bruce Fields bfie...@fieldses.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 07:12:09PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
Oops. Sorry, the correct sub-sub-sub-sub-paragraph is this one:
Permission to execute a file.
Servers SHOULD allow a user
> >> >> Oops. Sorry, the correct sub-sub-sub-sub-paragraph is this one:
> >> >>
> >> >> Permission to execute a file.
> >> >>
> >> >> Servers SHOULD allow a user the ability to read the data of the
> >> >> file when only the ACE4_EXECUTE access mask bit is allowed.
>
>> >> Oops. Sorry, the correct sub-sub-sub-sub-paragraph is this one:
>> >>
>> >> Permission to execute a file.
>> >>
>> >> Servers SHOULD allow a user the ability to read the data of the
>> >> file when only the ACE4_EXECUTE access mask bit is allowed.
>> >>
Oops. Sorry, the correct sub-sub-sub-sub-paragraph is this one:
Permission to execute a file.
Servers SHOULD allow a user the ability to read the data of the
file when only the ACE4_EXECUTE access mask bit is allowed.
This is because there is
Oops. Sorry, the correct sub-sub-sub-sub-paragraph is this one:
Permission to execute a file.
Servers SHOULD allow a user the ability to read the data of the
file when only the ACE4_EXECUTE access mask bit is allowed.
This is because
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Frank Filz
> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Trond Myklebust
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Frank Filz
> >> >
> >> wrote:
> >> >>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Frank S. Filz
> >> >>>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> > From: "Frank
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Frank Filz wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Trond Myklebust
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Frank Filz
>> wrote:
>> >>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Frank S. Filz
>> >>>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > From: "Frank S. Filz"
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Trond Myklebust
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Frank Filz
> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Frank S. Filz
> >>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > From: "Frank S. Filz"
> >>> >
> >>> > The NFS v4 client sends a COMPOUND with an OPEN and an ACCESS.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Trond Myklebust
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Frank S. Filz
>>> wrote:
>>> > From: "Frank S. Filz"
>>> >
>>> > The NFS v4 client sends a COMPOUND with an OPEN and an ACCESS.
>>> >
>>> > The ACCESS
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Frank S. Filz
>> wrote:
>> > From: "Frank S. Filz"
>> >
>> > The NFS v4 client sends a COMPOUND with an OPEN and an ACCESS.
>> >
>> > The ACCESS is required to verify an open for read is actually allowed
>> >
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Frank S. Filz
> wrote:
> > From: "Frank S. Filz"
> >
> > The NFS v4 client sends a COMPOUND with an OPEN and an ACCESS.
> >
> > The ACCESS is required to verify an open for read is actually allowed
> > because RFC 3530 indicates OPEN for read only must succeed
Hi Frank
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Frank S. Filz wrote:
> From: "Frank S. Filz"
>
> The NFS v4 client sends a COMPOUND with an OPEN and an ACCESS.
>
> The ACCESS is required to verify an open for read is actually
> allowed because RFC 3530 indicates OPEN for read only must succeed
> for
From: "Frank S. Filz"
I used the following program to test the patch:
It does report 4 failures, as expected, when the file does not already exist:
open("foo", O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_RDONLY, 000);
open("foo", O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_RDONLY, 111);
open("foo", O_CREAT |
From: Frank S. Filz ffilz...@mindspring.com
I used the following program to test the patch:
It does report 4 failures, as expected, when the file does not already exist:
open(foo, O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_RDONLY, 000);
open(foo, O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_RDONLY, 111);
open(foo,
Hi Frank
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Frank S. Filz ffilz...@mindspring.com wrote:
From: Frank S. Filz ffilz...@mindspring.com
The NFS v4 client sends a COMPOUND with an OPEN and an ACCESS.
The ACCESS is required to verify an open for read is actually
allowed because RFC 3530 indicates
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Frank S. Filz ffilz...@mindspring.com
wrote:
From: Frank S. Filz ffilz...@mindspring.com
The NFS v4 client sends a COMPOUND with an OPEN and an ACCESS.
The ACCESS is required to verify an open for read is actually allowed
because RFC 3530 indicates
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Frank Filz ffilz...@mindspring.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Frank S. Filz ffilz...@mindspring.com
wrote:
From: Frank S. Filz ffilz...@mindspring.com
The NFS v4 client sends a COMPOUND with an OPEN and an ACCESS.
The ACCESS is required to
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Trond Myklebust
trond.mykleb...@primarydata.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Frank Filz ffilz...@mindspring.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Frank S. Filz ffilz...@mindspring.com
wrote:
From: Frank S. Filz ffilz...@mindspring.com
The NFS
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Trond Myklebust
trond.mykleb...@primarydata.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Frank Filz ffilz...@mindspring.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Frank S. Filz
ffilz...@mindspring.com
wrote:
From: Frank S. Filz ffilz...@mindspring.com
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Frank Filz ffilz...@mindspring.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Trond Myklebust
trond.mykleb...@primarydata.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Frank Filz ffilz...@mindspring.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Frank S. Filz
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Frank Filz ffilz...@mindspring.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Trond Myklebust
trond.mykleb...@primarydata.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Frank Filz
ffilz...@mindspring.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Frank S.
24 matches
Mail list logo