RE: [PATCH 1/2] can: m_can: Increase delay to ensure written INIT accepted

rg; Ferre, Nicolas > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] can: m_can: Increase delay to ensure written INIT > accepted > > On 11/18/2015 11:04 AM, Wenyou Yang wrote: > > Increase the delay time until the value written to INIT can be read > > back to ensure that the previous value writte

Re: [PATCH 1/2] can: m_can: Increase delay to ensure written INIT accepted

On 11/18/2015 11:04 AM, Wenyou Yang wrote: > Increase the delay time until the value written to INIT can be > read back to ensure that the previous value written to INIT has > been accepted. > > Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang The patch looks ok, can you please add to your commit message which SoCs

Re: [PATCH 1/2] can: m_can: Increase delay to ensure written INIT accepted

On 11/18/2015 11:04 AM, Wenyou Yang wrote: > Increase the delay time until the value written to INIT can be > read back to ensure that the previous value written to INIT has > been accepted. > > Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang The patch looks ok, can you please add to your

RE: [PATCH 1/2] can: m_can: Increase delay to ensure written INIT accepted

rg; Ferre, Nicolas > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] can: m_can: Increase delay to ensure written INIT > accepted > > On 11/18/2015 11:04 AM, Wenyou Yang wrote: > > Increase the delay time until the value written to INIT can be read > > back to ensure that the previous value writte