Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com>; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>;
> Leo Li <leoyang...@nxp.com>; Xiaobo Xie <xiaobo@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: drop migrate type checks from
> has_unmovable_pages
>
> On Tue 14-11-17 06:10:00, Ran Wang
uaki Ishimatsu ;
> qiuxi...@huawei.com; Igor Mammedov ; Vitaly
> Kuznetsov ; LKML ;
> Leo Li ; Xiaobo Xie
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: drop migrate type checks from
> has_unmovable_pages
>
> On Tue 14-11-17 06:10:00, Ran Wang wrote:
> [...]
> > > >
On Tue 14-11-17 06:10:00, Ran Wang wrote:
[...]
> > > This drop cause DWC3 USB controller fail on initialization with
> > > Layerscaper processors (such as LS1043A) as below:
> > >
> > > [2.701437] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: new USB bus registered, assigned
> > bus number 1
> > > [2.710949]
On Tue 14-11-17 06:10:00, Ran Wang wrote:
[...]
> > > This drop cause DWC3 USB controller fail on initialization with
> > > Layerscaper processors (such as LS1043A) as below:
> > >
> > > [2.701437] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: new USB bus registered, assigned
> > bus number 1
> > > [2.710949]
Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com>; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>;
> Leo Li <leoyang...@nxp.com>; Xiaobo Xie <xiaobo@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: drop migrate type checks from
> has_unmovable_pages
>
> On Mon 13-11-17 07:33:13, Ran Wang
uaki Ishimatsu ;
> qiuxi...@huawei.com; Igor Mammedov ; Vitaly
> Kuznetsov ; LKML ;
> Leo Li ; Xiaobo Xie
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: drop migrate type checks from
> has_unmovable_pages
>
> On Mon 13-11-17 07:33:13, Ran Wang wrote:
> > Hello Michal,
> >
> >
&
On Mon 13-11-17 07:33:13, Ran Wang wrote:
> Hello Michal,
>
>
>
> > Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:00:12 +0200
> >
> > From: Michal Hocko
> >
> > Michael has noticed that the memory offline tries to migrate kernel code
> > pages when doing echo 0 >
On Mon 13-11-17 07:33:13, Ran Wang wrote:
> Hello Michal,
>
>
>
> > Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:00:12 +0200
> >
> > From: Michal Hocko
> >
> > Michael has noticed that the memory offline tries to migrate kernel code
> > pages when doing echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory0/online
> >
Hello Michal,
> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:00:12 +0200
>
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Michael has noticed that the memory offline tries to migrate kernel code
> pages when doing echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory0/online
>
> The current implementation will fail the
Hello Michal,
> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:00:12 +0200
>
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Michael has noticed that the memory offline tries to migrate kernel code
> pages when doing echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory0/online
>
> The current implementation will fail the operation after
On Thu 19-10-17 14:21:18, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> From 8cbd811d741f5dd93d1b21bb3ef94482a4d0bd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko
> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 14:14:02 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: distinguish CMA and MOVABLE isolation in
> has_unmovable_pages
>
>
On Thu 19-10-17 14:21:18, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> From 8cbd811d741f5dd93d1b21bb3ef94482a4d0bd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko
> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 14:14:02 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: distinguish CMA and MOVABLE isolation in
> has_unmovable_pages
>
> Joonsoo has noticed
On 10/19/2017 02:21 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 19-10-17 10:20:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Thu 19-10-17 16:33:56, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Thu 19-10-17 11:51:11, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> [...]
> Hello,
>
> This
On 10/19/2017 02:21 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 19-10-17 10:20:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Thu 19-10-17 16:33:56, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Thu 19-10-17 11:51:11, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> [...]
> Hello,
>
> This
On Thu 26-10-17 11:47:07, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:12:58AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 10/24/2017 06:44 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > >>> I'm not sure what is the confusing semantic you mentioned. I think
> > >>> that set_migratetype_isolate() has confusing semantic
On Thu 26-10-17 11:47:07, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:12:58AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 10/24/2017 06:44 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > >>> I'm not sure what is the confusing semantic you mentioned. I think
> > >>> that set_migratetype_isolate() has confusing semantic
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:12:58AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/24/2017 06:44 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >>> I'm not sure what is the confusing semantic you mentioned. I think
> >>> that set_migratetype_isolate() has confusing semantic and should be
> >>> fixed since making the pageblock
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:12:58AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/24/2017 06:44 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >>> I'm not sure what is the confusing semantic you mentioned. I think
> >>> that set_migratetype_isolate() has confusing semantic and should be
> >>> fixed since making the pageblock
On Tue 24-10-17 10:12:58, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/24/2017 06:44 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >>> I'm not sure what is the confusing semantic you mentioned. I think
> >>> that set_migratetype_isolate() has confusing semantic and should be
> >>> fixed since making the pageblock isolated doesn't
On Tue 24-10-17 10:12:58, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/24/2017 06:44 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >>> I'm not sure what is the confusing semantic you mentioned. I think
> >>> that set_migratetype_isolate() has confusing semantic and should be
> >>> fixed since making the pageblock isolated doesn't
On 10/24/2017 06:44 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>> I'm not sure what is the confusing semantic you mentioned. I think
>>> that set_migratetype_isolate() has confusing semantic and should be
>>> fixed since making the pageblock isolated doesn't need to check if
>>> there is unmovable page or not. Do
On 10/24/2017 06:44 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>> I'm not sure what is the confusing semantic you mentioned. I think
>>> that set_migratetype_isolate() has confusing semantic and should be
>>> fixed since making the pageblock isolated doesn't need to check if
>>> there is unmovable page or not. Do
On Tue 24-10-17 13:44:23, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:10:09AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > My intuitive understanding of set_migratetype_isolate is that it either
> > suceeds and that means that the given pfn range can be isolated for the
> > given type of allocation
On Tue 24-10-17 13:44:23, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:10:09AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > My intuitive understanding of set_migratetype_isolate is that it either
> > suceeds and that means that the given pfn range can be isolated for the
> > given type of allocation
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:10:09AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 23-10-17 14:23:09, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 09:02:20AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Fri 20-10-17 15:50:14, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 07:59:22AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:10:09AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 23-10-17 14:23:09, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 09:02:20AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Fri 20-10-17 15:50:14, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 07:59:22AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
On Mon 23-10-17 14:23:09, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 09:02:20AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 20-10-17 15:50:14, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 07:59:22AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Fri 20-10-17 11:13:29, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > > > On Thu,
On Mon 23-10-17 14:23:09, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 09:02:20AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 20-10-17 15:50:14, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 07:59:22AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Fri 20-10-17 11:13:29, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > > > On Thu,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:17:00AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 20-10-17 15:22:14, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> > On 2017/10/20 10:13, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > >> >From 8cbd811d741f5dd93d1b21bb3ef94482a4d0bd32 Mon Sep 17
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:17:00AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 20-10-17 15:22:14, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> > On 2017/10/20 10:13, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > >> >From 8cbd811d741f5dd93d1b21bb3ef94482a4d0bd32 Mon Sep 17
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 09:02:20AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 20-10-17 15:50:14, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 07:59:22AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Fri 20-10-17 11:13:29, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 09:02:20AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 20-10-17 15:50:14, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 07:59:22AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Fri 20-10-17 11:13:29, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
On Fri 20-10-17 15:22:14, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> On 2017/10/20 10:13, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> >> >From 8cbd811d741f5dd93d1b21bb3ef94482a4d0bd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Michal Hocko
> >> Date: Thu, 19
On Fri 20-10-17 15:22:14, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> On 2017/10/20 10:13, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> >> >From 8cbd811d741f5dd93d1b21bb3ef94482a4d0bd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Michal Hocko
> >> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 14:14:02
On 2017/10/20 10:13, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Thu 19-10-17 10:20:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Thu 19-10-17 16:33:56, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 19-10-17
On 2017/10/20 10:13, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Thu 19-10-17 10:20:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Thu 19-10-17 16:33:56, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 19-10-17
On Fri 20-10-17 15:50:14, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 07:59:22AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 20-10-17 11:13:29, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Thu 19-10-17 10:20:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > > On Thu
On Fri 20-10-17 15:50:14, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 07:59:22AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 20-10-17 11:13:29, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Thu 19-10-17 10:20:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > > On Thu
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 07:59:22AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 20-10-17 11:13:29, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 19-10-17 10:20:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Thu 19-10-17 16:33:56, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > > > On Thu,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 07:59:22AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 20-10-17 11:13:29, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 19-10-17 10:20:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Thu 19-10-17 16:33:56, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > > > On Thu,
On Fri 20-10-17 11:13:29, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 19-10-17 10:20:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 19-10-17 16:33:56, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > > On Thu
On Fri 20-10-17 11:13:29, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 19-10-17 10:20:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 19-10-17 16:33:56, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > > On Thu
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 19-10-17 10:20:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 19-10-17 16:33:56, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Thu 19-10-17 11:51:11, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > [...]
> > > >
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 19-10-17 10:20:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 19-10-17 16:33:56, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Thu 19-10-17 11:51:11, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > [...]
> > > >
On Thu 19-10-17 10:20:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 19-10-17 16:33:56, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 19-10-17 11:51:11, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> [...]
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > This patch will break the CMA user. As you
On Thu 19-10-17 10:20:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 19-10-17 16:33:56, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 19-10-17 11:51:11, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> [...]
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > This patch will break the CMA user. As you
On Thu 19-10-17 16:33:56, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 19-10-17 11:51:11, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
[...]
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > This patch will break the CMA user. As you mentioned, CMA allocation
> > > itself isn't migrateable. So,
On Thu 19-10-17 16:33:56, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 19-10-17 11:51:11, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
[...]
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > This patch will break the CMA user. As you mentioned, CMA allocation
> > > itself isn't migrateable. So,
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 19-10-17 11:51:11, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 02:00:12PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > From: Michal Hocko
> > >
> > > Michael has noticed that the memory offline tries to migrate kernel
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 19-10-17 11:51:11, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 02:00:12PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > From: Michal Hocko
> > >
> > > Michael has noticed that the memory offline tries to migrate kernel code
> > > pages
On Thu 19-10-17 11:51:11, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 02:00:12PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko
> >
> > Michael has noticed that the memory offline tries to migrate kernel code
> > pages when doing
> > echo 0 >
On Thu 19-10-17 11:51:11, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 02:00:12PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko
> >
> > Michael has noticed that the memory offline tries to migrate kernel code
> > pages when doing
> > echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory0/online
> >
>
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 02:00:12PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Michael has noticed that the memory offline tries to migrate kernel code
> pages when doing
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory0/online
>
> The current implementation will fail the
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 02:00:12PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Michael has noticed that the memory offline tries to migrate kernel code
> pages when doing
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory0/online
>
> The current implementation will fail the operation after
On 10/13/2017 02:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Michael has noticed that the memory offline tries to migrate kernel code
> pages when doing
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory0/online
>
> The current implementation will fail the operation after
On 10/13/2017 02:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Michael has noticed that the memory offline tries to migrate kernel code
> pages when doing
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory0/online
>
> The current implementation will fail the operation after several failed
>
On Tue 17-10-17 22:41:08, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Michal Hocko writes:
>
> > From: Michal Hocko
> >
> > Michael has noticed that the memory offline tries to migrate kernel code
> > pages when doing
> > echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory0/online
> >
On Tue 17-10-17 22:41:08, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Michal Hocko writes:
>
> > From: Michal Hocko
> >
> > Michael has noticed that the memory offline tries to migrate kernel code
> > pages when doing
> > echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory0/online
> >
> > The current implementation will
Michal Hocko writes:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Michael has noticed that the memory offline tries to migrate kernel code
> pages when doing
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory0/online
>
> The current implementation will fail the operation after
Michal Hocko writes:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Michael has noticed that the memory offline tries to migrate kernel code
> pages when doing
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory0/online
>
> The current implementation will fail the operation after several failed
> page migration attempts
60 matches
Mail list logo