On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:25:33PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > + case E820_PROTECTED_KERN:
> > + printk(KERN_CONT "protected (type %u)\n", type);
>
> I don't think we want a newline in this string.
Fixed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 07:47:26PM +, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
wrote:
> If this goes into the kernel, I think someone should request that the
> ACPI specification mark the value 12 as permanently tainted. Otherwise
> they could assign it to some new meaning that conflicts with all
> o
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 17:04 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Various recent bioses support NVDIMMs or ADR using a non-standard
> e820 memory type, and Intel supplied reference Linux code using this
> type to various vendors.
>
> Wire this e820 table type up to export platform devices for the pmem
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 17:04 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Various recent bioses support NVDIMMs or ADR using a non-standard
> e820 memory type, and Intel supplied reference Linux code using this
> type to various vendors.
>
> Wire this e820 table type up to export platform devices for the pmem
A few editorial nits follow...
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Christoph Hellwig
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 11:04 AM
> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] x86: add support for the non-standard protected e82
5 matches
Mail list logo
