Re: [PATCH V2] firmware: imx: Skip return value check for some special SCU firmware APIs

2019-10-14 Thread Shawn Guo
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 09:15:59AM +0800, Anson Huang wrote: > The SCU firmware does NOT always have return value stored in message > header's function element even the API has response data, those special > APIs are defined as void function in SCU firmware, so they should be > treated as return su

Re: [PATCH V2] firmware: imx: Skip return value check for some special SCU firmware APIs

2019-10-09 Thread Marco Felsch
Hi Anson, On 19-10-09 09:09, Anson Huang wrote: > Hi, Marco > > > On 19-10-07 09:15, Anson Huang wrote: > > > The SCU firmware does NOT always have return value stored in message > > > header's function element even the API has response data, those > > > special APIs are defined as void function

RE: [PATCH V2] firmware: imx: Skip return value check for some special SCU firmware APIs

2019-10-09 Thread Anson Huang
Hi, Marco > On 19-10-07 09:15, Anson Huang wrote: > > The SCU firmware does NOT always have return value stored in message > > header's function element even the API has response data, those > > special APIs are defined as void function in SCU firmware, so they > > should be treated as return succ

Re: [PATCH V2] firmware: imx: Skip return value check for some special SCU firmware APIs

2019-10-09 Thread Marco Felsch
Hi Anson, On 19-10-07 09:15, Anson Huang wrote: > The SCU firmware does NOT always have return value stored in message > header's function element even the API has response data, those special > APIs are defined as void function in SCU firmware, so they should be > treated as return success always

Re: [PATCH V2] firmware: imx: Skip return value check for some special SCU firmware APIs

2019-10-09 Thread Marco Felsch
On 19-10-09 08:28, Anson Huang wrote: > Hi, Marco > > > On 19-10-08 00:48, Anson Huang wrote: > > > Hi, Marco > > > > > > > On 19-10-07 09:15, Anson Huang wrote: > > > > > The SCU firmware does NOT always have return value stored in > > > > > message header's function element even the API has resp

RE: [PATCH V2] firmware: imx: Skip return value check for some special SCU firmware APIs

2019-10-09 Thread Anson Huang
Hi, Marco > On 19-10-08 00:48, Anson Huang wrote: > > Hi, Marco > > > > > On 19-10-07 09:15, Anson Huang wrote: > > > > The SCU firmware does NOT always have return value stored in > > > > message header's function element even the API has response data, > > > > those special APIs are defined as v

Re: [PATCH V2] firmware: imx: Skip return value check for some special SCU firmware APIs

2019-10-09 Thread Marco Felsch
Hi Anson, On 19-10-08 00:48, Anson Huang wrote: > Hi, Marco > > > On 19-10-07 09:15, Anson Huang wrote: > > > The SCU firmware does NOT always have return value stored in message > > > header's function element even the API has response data, those > > > special APIs are defined as void function

RE: [PATCH V2] firmware: imx: Skip return value check for some special SCU firmware APIs

2019-10-07 Thread Anson Huang
Hi, Marco > On 19-10-07 09:15, Anson Huang wrote: > > The SCU firmware does NOT always have return value stored in message > > header's function element even the API has response data, those > > special APIs are defined as void function in SCU firmware, so they > > should be treated as return succ

Re: [PATCH V2] firmware: imx: Skip return value check for some special SCU firmware APIs

2019-10-07 Thread Marco Felsch
Hi Anson, On 19-10-07 09:15, Anson Huang wrote: > The SCU firmware does NOT always have return value stored in message > header's function element even the API has response data, those special > APIs are defined as void function in SCU firmware, so they should be > treated as return success always