RE: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

2015-11-24 Thread KY Srinivasan
t; a...@canonical.com; jasow...@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head > room in the skb > > K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > The rndis header is 116 bytes big and can be placed in the default > > head room that will be

RE: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

2015-11-24 Thread KY Srinivasan
rg; o...@aepfle.de; > a...@canonical.com; jasow...@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head > room in the skb > > "K. Y. Srinivasan" writes: > > > The rndis header is 116 bytes big and can be placed in the default > >

Re: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

2015-11-24 Thread Vitaly Kuznetsov
"K. Y. Srinivasan" writes: > The rndis header is 116 bytes big and can be placed in the default > head room that will be available in the skb. We have the following in include/linux/netdevice.h: #if defined(CONFIG_WLAN) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AX25) # if defined(CONFIG_MAC80211_MESH) # define

Re: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

2015-11-24 Thread Florian Westphal
K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > The rndis header is 116 bytes big and can be placed in the default > head room that will be available in the skb. Since the netvsc packet > is less than 48 bytes, we can use the skb control buffer > for the netvsc packet. With these changes we don't need to > ask for

RE: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

2015-11-24 Thread KY Srinivasan
ject.org; o...@aepfle.de; > a...@canonical.com; jasow...@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head > room in the skb > > "K. Y. Srinivasan" <k...@microsoft.com> writes: > > > The rndis header

RE: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

2015-11-24 Thread KY Srinivasan
ject.org; o...@aepfle.de; > a...@canonical.com; jasow...@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head > room in the skb > > K. Y. Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > The rndis header is 116 bytes big and can be placed

Re: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

2015-11-24 Thread Florian Westphal
K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > The rndis header is 116 bytes big and can be placed in the default > head room that will be available in the skb. Since the netvsc packet > is less than 48 bytes, we can use the skb control buffer > for the netvsc packet. With these changes we don't

Re: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

2015-11-24 Thread Vitaly Kuznetsov
"K. Y. Srinivasan" writes: > The rndis header is 116 bytes big and can be placed in the default > head room that will be available in the skb. We have the following in include/linux/netdevice.h: #if defined(CONFIG_WLAN) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AX25) # if