g; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 03:39:04AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> > Dudley,
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 02:44:15AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> > > Du
omail.se;
> ble...@google.com; linux-in...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
>
> Dave,
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 06:00:29PM +, David Solda wrote:
> > Can we just reverse the prior change
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 03:39:04AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> Dudley,
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 02:44:15AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> > Dudley,
> >
> > Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I
> > could not test them because I ran in to a bug created by someone
> >
; linux-in...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
Dave,
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 06:00:29PM +, David Solda wrote:
Can we just reverse the prior change that caused the bug, or are you saying
that
the owner
@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 03:39:04AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
Dudley,
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 02:44:15AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
Dudley,
Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 03:39:04AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
Dudley,
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 02:44:15AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
Dudley,
Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I
could not test them because I ran in to a bug created by someone
elses patch
Dave,
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 06:00:29PM +, David Solda wrote:
> Can we just reverse the prior change that caused the bug, or are you saying
> that the owner of the prior patch has to fix it?
>
> Dave
>
I tried to revert the patch but it didn't do so cleanly.
git revert ea2c67bb4aff
Can we just reverse the prior change that caused the bug, or are you saying
that the owner of the prior patch has to fix it?
Dave
> On Jan 17, 2015, at 2:44 AM, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
>
> Dudley,
>
> Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I
> could not test them because I
Dudley,
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 02:44:15AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> Dudley,
>
> Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I
> could not test them because I ran in to a bug created by someone
> elses patch (not yours) [1].
>
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/17/24
>
>
Dudley,
Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I
could not test them because I ran in to a bug created by someone
elses patch (not yours) [1].
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/17/24
Once that issue gets resolved I would be happy to test your patch
series.
On Fri, Jan 16,
Dave,
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 06:00:29PM +, David Solda wrote:
Can we just reverse the prior change that caused the bug, or are you saying
that the owner of the prior patch has to fix it?
Dave
I tried to revert the patch but it didn't do so cleanly.
git revert ea2c67bb4aff
So I
Can we just reverse the prior change that caused the bug, or are you saying
that the owner of the prior patch has to fix it?
Dave
On Jan 17, 2015, at 2:44 AM, Jeremiah Mahler jmmah...@gmail.com wrote:
Dudley,
Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I
could not test
Dudley,
Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I
could not test them because I ran in to a bug created by someone
elses patch (not yours) [1].
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/17/24
Once that issue gets resolved I would be happy to test your patch
series.
On Fri, Jan 16,
Dudley,
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 02:44:15AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
Dudley,
Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I
could not test them because I ran in to a bug created by someone
elses patch (not yours) [1].
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/17/24
Once
14 matches
Mail list logo
