On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 09:55:53 AM Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi, Mika
>
> > From: Mika Westerberg [mailto:mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com]
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] ACPICA: Namespace: Fix a regression that MLC
> > support triggers dead lock in dynamic table loading
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016
On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 09:55:53 AM Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi, Mika
>
> > From: Mika Westerberg [mailto:mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com]
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] ACPICA: Namespace: Fix a regression that MLC
> > support triggers dead lock in dynamic table loading
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016
Hi, Mika
> From: Mika Westerberg [mailto:mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] ACPICA: Namespace: Fix a regression that MLC
> support triggers dead lock in dynamic table loading
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:34:15PM +0800, Lv Zheng wrote:
> > The new MLC approach
Hi, Mika
> From: Mika Westerberg [mailto:mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] ACPICA: Namespace: Fix a regression that MLC
> support triggers dead lock in dynamic table loading
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:34:15PM +0800, Lv Zheng wrote:
> > The new MLC approach
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:34:15PM +0800, Lv Zheng wrote:
> The new MLC approach invokes MLC per-table basis. But the dynamic loading
> support of this is incorrect because of the lock order:
> acpi_ns_evaluate
>acpi_ex_enter_intperter
> acpi_ns_load_table (triggered by Load opcode)
>
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:34:15PM +0800, Lv Zheng wrote:
> The new MLC approach invokes MLC per-table basis. But the dynamic loading
> support of this is incorrect because of the lock order:
> acpi_ns_evaluate
>acpi_ex_enter_intperter
> acpi_ns_load_table (triggered by Load opcode)
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
