RE: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org

2001-02-01 Thread Jonathan Earle
> Malcolm Beattie writes: > > Alexey has mailed me suggesting the problem may be that netfilter > > is turned on. > > Oh yes, netfilter being enabled will cause some performance > degradation, that is for sure. Do you think that netfilter being enabled would also cause a decrease in routing

Re: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org

2001-02-01 Thread David S. Miller
Malcolm Beattie writes: > Alexey has mailed me suggesting the problem may be that netfilter > is turned on. Oh yes, netfilter being enabled will cause some performance degradation, that is for sure. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org

2001-02-01 Thread Malcolm Beattie
David S. Miller writes: > > Malcolm Beattie writes: > > David S. Miller writes: > > > > > > At the usual place: > > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1-1.diff.gz > > > > Hmm, disappointing results here; maybe I've missed something. > > As

Re: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org

2001-02-01 Thread David S. Miller
Malcolm Beattie writes: Alexey has mailed me suggesting the problem may be that netfilter is turned on. Oh yes, netfilter being enabled will cause some performance degradation, that is for sure. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

RE: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org

2001-02-01 Thread Jonathan Earle
Malcolm Beattie writes: Alexey has mailed me suggesting the problem may be that netfilter is turned on. Oh yes, netfilter being enabled will cause some performance degradation, that is for sure. Do you think that netfilter being enabled would also cause a decrease in routing

Re: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org

2001-01-31 Thread David S. Miller
Malcolm Beattie writes: > David S. Miller writes: > > > > At the usual place: > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1-1.diff.gz > > Hmm, disappointing results here; maybe I've missed something. As discussed elsewhere there is a %10 to %15 performance

Re: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org

2001-01-31 Thread Malcolm Beattie
David S. Miller writes: > > At the usual place: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1-1.diff.gz Hmm, disappointing results here; maybe I've missed something. Setup is a Pentium II 350MHz (tusk) connected to a Pentium III 733MHz (heffalump) (both 512MB RAM) with

Re: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org

2001-01-31 Thread Malcolm Beattie
David S. Miller writes: At the usual place: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1-1.diff.gz Hmm, disappointing results here; maybe I've missed something. Setup is a Pentium II 350MHz (tusk) connected to a Pentium III 733MHz (heffalump) (both 512MB RAM) with SX

Re: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org

2001-01-31 Thread David S. Miller
Malcolm Beattie writes: David S. Miller writes: At the usual place: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1-1.diff.gz Hmm, disappointing results here; maybe I've missed something. As discussed elsewhere there is a %10 to %15 performance hit for

Re: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org

2001-01-30 Thread David S. Miller
Chris Wedgwood writes: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 01:33:34AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > 2) Accept TCP flags (ACK, URG, RST, etc.) for out of window packets >if truncating the data to the window would make that packet valid. >(Alexey) > > 3) Add

Re: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org

2001-01-30 Thread David S. Miller
Chris Wedgwood writes: On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 01:33:34AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: 2) Accept TCP flags (ACK, URG, RST, etc.) for out of window packets if truncating the data to the window would make that packet valid. (Alexey) 3) Add SO_ACCEPTCONN, Unix