On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 11:32:44PM +0200, Mircea Damian wrote:
> Call me idiot too but please explain what is wrong here:
What is wrong is that this is the kernel list, not the LILO list.
> root@taz:~# lilo -v
> LILO version 21.7, Copyright (C) 1992-1998 Werner Almesberger
> Device 0x0300: Inva
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 12:39:32PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Mar 2001 19:19:28 -0600,
> "Steven J. Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I have no idea why the 1023 limit is coming up considering 2.4.2 and
> >LILO were working just fine together and I have a newer BIOS that has
> >not
>LILO version 21.4-4, Copyright (C) 1992-1998 Werner Almesberger
>'lba32' extensions Copyright (C) 1999,2000 John Coffman
>
>Boot image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.3-pre1
>Fatal: geo_comp_addr: Cylinder number is too big (1274 > 1023)
>
> I have no idea why the 1023 limit is coming up con
Andre Tomt wrote:
>
> >'lba32' extensions Copyright (C) 1999,2000 John Coffman
> ^^
>
> Add lba32 as the top line in lilo.conf. Re-run lilo.
>
> > Fatal: geo_comp_addr: Cylinder number is too big (1274 > 1023)
>
> Before 2.4.3pre1, your kernel just happened to toss itself below cy
>'lba32' extensions Copyright (C) 1999,2000 John Coffman
^^
Add lba32 as the top line in lilo.conf. Re-run lilo.
> Fatal: geo_comp_addr: Cylinder number is too big (1274 > 1023)
Before 2.4.3pre1, your kernel just happened to toss itself below cylinder
1024.
> Go ahead, call me idi
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: LILO error with 2.4.3-pre1...
> On Sat, 03 Mar 2001 19:19:28 -0600,
> "Steven J. Hil
On Sat, 03 Mar 2001 19:19:28 -0600,
"Steven J. Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have no idea why the 1023 limit is coming up considering 2.4.2 and
>LILO were working just fine together and I have a newer BIOS that has
>not problems detecting the driver properly. Go ahead, call me idiot :).
OK
7 matches
Mail list logo
