RE: NFSD die with 2.4.1 (resend with ksymoops)

2001-02-15 Thread Neil Brown
On Thursday February 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Here I am again! NFSD died at 11h23, ~12 hours after the last reboot, a > record :-) I'm guessing you don't have many symlinks on the exported filesystem > I'll try to best answer your questions. > > > This trace seems to make sense,

RE: NFSD die with 2.4.1

2001-02-15 Thread Jean-Eric Cuendet
Here is a complete trace of the Oops I have. I have a new compiled kernel with NFSD in the kernel with vmlinux available for it. I attached the ksymoops and the gdb stuff oops.orig : as found in /var/log/messages oops.ksyms : output of ksymoops oops.disassemble : output of "echo disassemble

RE: NFSD die with 2.4.1 (resend with ksymoops)

2001-02-15 Thread Jean-Eric Cuendet
Here I am again! NFSD died at 11h23, ~12 hours after the last reboot, a record :-) I'll try to best answer your questions. > This trace seems to make sense, except that nfssvc_encode_diropres > doesn't seem to make any subroutine calls at offset 100 as seems to be > implied. > > Could you run

RE: NFSD die with 2.4.1 (resend with ksymoops)

2001-02-15 Thread Jean-Eric Cuendet
Here I am again! NFSD died at 11h23, ~12 hours after the last reboot, a record :-) I'll try to best answer your questions. This trace seems to make sense, except that nfssvc_encode_diropres doesn't seem to make any subroutine calls at offset 100 as seems to be implied. Could you run

RE: NFSD die with 2.4.1

2001-02-15 Thread Jean-Eric Cuendet
Here is a complete trace of the Oops I have. I have a new compiled kernel with NFSD in the kernel with vmlinux available for it. I attached the ksymoops and the gdb stuff oops.orig : as found in /var/log/messages oops.ksyms : output of ksymoops oops.disassemble : output of "echo disassemble

RE: NFSD die with 2.4.1 (resend with ksymoops)

2001-02-15 Thread Neil Brown
On Thursday February 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here I am again! NFSD died at 11h23, ~12 hours after the last reboot, a record :-) I'm guessing you don't have many symlinks on the exported filesystem I'll try to best answer your questions. This trace seems to make sense, except

Re: NFSD die with 2.4.1 (resend with ksymoops)

2001-02-14 Thread Neil Brown
On Wednesday February 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi all, > I have a machine with kernel 2.4.1 + acls patch. It exports some volume via > NFS (installed with RedHat 7.0 + custom 2.4.1 kernel). The underlying > filesystem is ext2. I tried with NFS v2 and v3 and without ACLs in the > kernel.

Re: NFSD die with 2.4.1 (resend with ksymoops)

2001-02-14 Thread Neil Brown
On Wednesday February 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I have a machine with kernel 2.4.1 + acls patch. It exports some volume via NFS (installed with RedHat 7.0 + custom 2.4.1 kernel). The underlying filesystem is ext2. I tried with NFS v2 and v3 and without ACLs in the kernel.