RE: Need for more ISO8859 codepages?

2001-02-03 Thread Nerijus Baliunas
> About 18 months ago I patched fs/nls/ to include support for the > Celtic character set, ISO8859-14. I notice that there are still gaps > in nls, specifically in ISO8859 codepages 10 to 13. > > The missing codepages are for Nordic/Icelandic (ISO8859-10), Thai > (ISO8859-11), and Baltic Rim

RE: Need for more ISO8859 codepages?

2001-02-03 Thread Nerijus Baliunas
About 18 months ago I patched fs/nls/ to include support for the Celtic character set, ISO8859-14. I notice that there are still gaps in nls, specifically in ISO8859 codepages 10 to 13. The missing codepages are for Nordic/Icelandic (ISO8859-10), Thai (ISO8859-11), and Baltic Rim

Re: Need for more ISO8859 codepages?

2001-02-01 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author:"Rhys Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Hello, > > Please forgive a semi-newbie post. > > About 18 months ago I patched fs/nls/ to include support for the > Celtic character set, ISO8859-14. I notice that there are

Re: Need for more ISO8859 codepages?

2001-02-01 Thread Pierre Rousselet
Rhys Jones wrote: > Any and all feedback appreciated. need for less codepages. Is 8859-1 still useful ? Why not moving to 8859-15 (and cp1252) ? -- Pierre Rousselet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To

Re: Need for more ISO8859 codepages?

2001-02-01 Thread Pierre Rousselet
Rhys Jones wrote: Any and all feedback appreciated. need for less codepages. Is 8859-1 still useful ? Why not moving to 8859-15 (and cp1252) ? -- Pierre Rousselet [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To

Re: Need for more ISO8859 codepages?

2001-02-01 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] By author:"Rhys Jones" [EMAIL PROTECTED] In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel Hello, Please forgive a semi-newbie post. About 18 months ago I patched fs/nls/ to include support for the Celtic character set, ISO8859-14. I notice that there are still gaps in