>From: Arjan van de Ven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> I gave it a quick try (must admit, not too tested) and it seems that
>> the setting of TIF_SIGPENDING without really having a signal queued
>> is not having easily visible ugly consequences.
>
>what happens if you get a signal around the time
From: Arjan van de Ven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I gave it a quick try (must admit, not too tested) and it seems that
the setting of TIF_SIGPENDING without really having a signal queued
is not having easily visible ugly consequences.
what happens if you get a signal around the time the
> I gave it a quick try (must admit, not too tested) and it seems that
> the setting of TIF_SIGPENDING without really having a signal queued
> is not having easily visible ugly consequences.
what happens if you get a signal around the time the timeout fires?
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
I gave it a quick try (must admit, not too tested) and it seems that
the setting of TIF_SIGPENDING without really having a signal queued
is not having easily visible ugly consequences.
what happens if you get a signal around the time the timeout fires?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
4 matches
Mail list logo