>I think what we are seeing is XBoot rather than yaboot and we tried just
>about all conceivable "kernel options", as exposed by Xboot. When Xboot
>comes up it shows a ramdisk_size=8192 as the only default parameter.
>Rapidly growing to hate the non-intuitive nature of the MAC OS we are
>not exper
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Tim McDaniel wrote:
> I think what we are seeing is XBoot rather than yaboot and we tried just
> about all conceivable "kernel options", as exposed by Xboot. When Xboot
> comes up it shows a ramdisk_size=8192 as the only default parameter.
> Rapidly growing to hate the non-i
I think what we are seeing is XBoot rather than yaboot and we tried just
about all conceivable "kernel options", as exposed by Xboot. When Xboot
comes up it shows a ramdisk_size=8192 as the only default parameter.
Rapidly growing to hate the non-intuitive nature of the MAC OS we are
not experts on
3 matches
Mail list logo
