Re: e1000 issue on DQ965GF board (was 24 lost ticks with 2.6.20.10 kernel)

2007-05-04 Thread Michel Lespinasse
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 11:25:43AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote: > can you try turning off the "management enable" function in the BIOS of the > DQ965GF? That fixes this issue for us in our labs. A fix for this is also > available in our standalone 7.5.5.1 driver (obtainable from e1000.sf.net), > but

Re: e1000 issue on DQ965GF board (was 24 lost ticks with 2.6.20.10 kernel)

2007-05-04 Thread Kok, Auke
Michel Lespinasse wrote: On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:14:52AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote: I just checked and the fix I was referring to earlier didn't make it into 2.6.21-final. You can get 2.6.21-git1 from kernel.org which has the fix. See http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/patch

RE: e1000 issue on DQ965GF board (was 24 lost ticks with 2.6.20.10 kernel)

2007-05-03 Thread Allan, Bruce W
se Cc: Kok, Auke-jan H; Chuck Ebbert; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Dave Jones; cramerj; Ronciak, John; Brandeburg, Jesse; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Allan, Bruce W Subject: Re: e1000 issue on DQ965GF board (was 24 lost ticks with 2.6.20.10 kernel) [Adding Bruce to the Cc, reply below] Michel Lespinasse

Re: e1000 issue on DQ965GF board (was 24 lost ticks with 2.6.20.10 kernel)

2007-05-03 Thread Kok, Auke
[Adding Bruce to the Cc, reply below] Michel Lespinasse wrote: On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:14:52AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote: I just checked and the fix I was referring to earlier didn't make it into 2.6.21-final. You can get 2.6.21-git1 from kernel.org which has the fix. See http://www.kernel.or