On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 08:46:04AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> This being said, I don't know how you would change the ONFI spec and
> keep it compatible with the previous version. As I said, the current
> version of the spec does not reserve any area after the mandatory
> parameter pages...
> Y
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:59:27 -0800
Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 04:21:01AM +, Bean Huo 霍斌斌 (beanhuo) wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:42:34PM +, Bean Huo 霍斌斌 (beanhuo)
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Recently, I faced some case about ONFI table reliability
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 04:21:01AM +, Bean Huo 霍斌斌 (beanhuo) wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:42:34PM +, Bean Huo 霍斌斌 (beanhuo)
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Recently, I faced some case about ONFI table reliability, now it used CRC.
> > > If there is bit flips in ONFI parameter page
>
> Hi Bean,
>
> I was sorting through old email and I found this.
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:42:34PM +, Bean Huo 霍斌斌 (beanhuo)
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Recently, I faced some case about ONFI table reliability, now it used CRC.
> > If there is bit flips in ONFI parameter pages, parameter
Hi Bean,
I was sorting through old email and I found this.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:42:34PM +, Bean Huo 霍斌斌 (beanhuo) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently, I faced some case about ONFI table reliability, now it used CRC.
> If there is bit flips in ONFI parameter pages, parameter backup page will be
5 matches
Mail list logo