> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Sloat
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 8:55 AM
> To: dmitry.torok...@gmail.com
> Cc: Kasun Beddewela <kbeddew...@aampglobal.com>; linux-
> in...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Ken Sloat
> <ksl...@aampglobal.com>
> Subject: input: Device Tree Properties for Captouch Button Device Registers
> 
> Hello Dmitry,
> 
> We have a new input driver we are currently working on and would like to
> submit
> to the Linux kernel when we finish it. Specifically, this is a cap touch IC 
> which
> implements potentially multiple individual proximity and cap touch buttons
> (which
> would be reported like key events as seems to be the standard). A couple of
> questions:
> 
> 1. What is the preferred/proper method to expose the many registers that
> these devices have via device tree?
> 
> These devices have dozens of registers, many of which might be needed
> depending
> on the individual application. It wouldn't be useful in the majority of cases 
> to
> provide
> default values in the driver as the registers are custom tuned to the
> individual application.
> 
> 2. Where should this device live? I am guessing in input/misc?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ken Sloat

CC'ing people from device tree mailing list since this discussion would be 
relevant there as well, so the more generic question would be: For any device 
which requires multiple unique register configuration values per target 
application - what is the preferred method to expose all these via devicetree? 
Maybe there are some good examples of this already somewhere in the kernel 
drivers?

Thanks,
Ken Sloat

Reply via email to