RE: libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-26 Thread Tomita, Haruo
Hi Bunk, Thank you for your replay. > With SCSI=m and SCSI_SATA=y this allows the static enabling > of the SATA drivers with unwanted effects, e.g.: > - SCSI=m, SCSI_SATA=y, SCSI_ATA_ADMA=y > -> SCSI_ATA_ADMA is built statically but scsi/built-in.o is > not linked > into the kernel > -

RE: libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-26 Thread Tomita, Haruo
Hi Bunk, Thank you for your replay. With SCSI=m and SCSI_SATA=y this allows the static enabling of the SATA drivers with unwanted effects, e.g.: - SCSI=m, SCSI_SATA=y, SCSI_ATA_ADMA=y - SCSI_ATA_ADMA is built statically but scsi/built-in.o is not linked into the kernel - SCSI=m,

Re: libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 09:04:37AM +0900, Tomita, Haruo wrote: > On Thursday, August 25, 2005 8:02 PM (JST), Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > 2.6.13- rc7-libata1.patch.bz2 was used. > > > A combined mode of ata_piix seems not to work. > > > Is the following patches correct? > > > > > > diff -urN

RE: libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-25 Thread Tomita, Haruo
On Thursday, August 25, 2005 8:02 PM (JST), Adrian Bunk wrote: > > 2.6.13- rc7-libata1.patch.bz2 was used. > > A combined mode of ata_piix seems not to work. > > Is the following patches correct? > > > > diff -urN linux-2.6.13-rc7.orig/drivers/scsi/Kconfig >

Re: libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:56:23PM +0900, Tomita, Haruo wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > 2.6.13- rc7-libata1.patch.bz2 was used. > A combined mode of ata_piix seems not to work. > Is the following patches correct? > > diff -urN linux-2.6.13-rc7.orig/drivers/scsi/Kconfig >

RE: libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-25 Thread Tomita, Haruo
Hi Jeff, 2.6.13- rc7-libata1.patch.bz2 was used. A combined mode of ata_piix seems not to work. Is the following patches correct? diff -urN linux-2.6.13-rc7.orig/drivers/scsi/Kconfig linux-2.6.13-rc7/drivers/scsi/Kconfig --- linux-2.6.13-rc7.orig/drivers/scsi/Kconfig 2005-08-25

RE: libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-25 Thread Tomita, Haruo
Hi Jeff, 2.6.13- rc7-libata1.patch.bz2 was used. A combined mode of ata_piix seems not to work. Is the following patches correct? diff -urN linux-2.6.13-rc7.orig/drivers/scsi/Kconfig linux-2.6.13-rc7/drivers/scsi/Kconfig --- linux-2.6.13-rc7.orig/drivers/scsi/Kconfig 2005-08-25

Re: libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:56:23PM +0900, Tomita, Haruo wrote: Hi Jeff, 2.6.13- rc7-libata1.patch.bz2 was used. A combined mode of ata_piix seems not to work. Is the following patches correct? diff -urN linux-2.6.13-rc7.orig/drivers/scsi/Kconfig linux-2.6.13-rc7/drivers/scsi/Kconfig

RE: libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-25 Thread Tomita, Haruo
On Thursday, August 25, 2005 8:02 PM (JST), Adrian Bunk wrote: 2.6.13- rc7-libata1.patch.bz2 was used. A combined mode of ata_piix seems not to work. Is the following patches correct? diff -urN linux-2.6.13-rc7.orig/drivers/scsi/Kconfig linux-2.6.13-rc7/drivers/scsi/Kconfig ---

Re: libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 09:04:37AM +0900, Tomita, Haruo wrote: On Thursday, August 25, 2005 8:02 PM (JST), Adrian Bunk wrote: 2.6.13- rc7-libata1.patch.bz2 was used. A combined mode of ata_piix seems not to work. Is the following patches correct? diff -urN