On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> >> Hm? 3.16 doesn't contain my patch yet. It's merged for 3.17-rc1.
>> >
>> > Oh, you are right of course, I am on upstream kernel and I have your
>> > patch. I don't mean your match is causing the issue though ;-).
>> >
>>
>> I think this
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:00:24 -0600,
Shuah Khan wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Jean-Michel Hautbois
> wrote:
> > 2014-08-06 11:24 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai :
> >> At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:10:27 +0200,
> >> Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 2014-08-05 21:22 GMT+02:00 Shuah Khan :
> >>>
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:00:24 -0600,
Shuah Khan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Jean-Michel Hautbois
jhautb...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-08-06 11:24 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de:
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:10:27 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-05 21:22 GMT+02:00 Shuah
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de wrote:
Hm? 3.16 doesn't contain my patch yet. It's merged for 3.17-rc1.
Oh, you are right of course, I am on upstream kernel and I have your
patch. I don't mean your match is causing the issue though ;-).
I think this is what
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Jean-Michel Hautbois
wrote:
> 2014-08-06 11:24 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai :
>> At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:10:27 +0200,
>> Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
>>>
>>> 2014-08-05 21:22 GMT+02:00 Shuah Khan :
>>> > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>> >>> Yes, it
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:24:37 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
>
> 2014-08-06 12:52 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai :
> > At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 12:50:28 +0200,
> > Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> >>
> >> 2014-08-06 12:21 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai :
> >> > At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:44:14 +0200,
> >> > Jean-Michel
2014-08-06 12:52 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai :
> At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 12:50:28 +0200,
> Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
>>
>> 2014-08-06 12:21 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai :
>> > At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:44:14 +0200,
>> > Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 2014-08-06 11:24 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai :
>> >> > At
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 12:50:28 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
>
> 2014-08-06 12:21 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai :
> > At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:44:14 +0200,
> > Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> >>
> >> 2014-08-06 11:24 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai :
> >> > At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:10:27 +0200,
> >> > Jean-Michel
2014-08-06 12:21 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai :
> At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:44:14 +0200,
> Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
>>
>> 2014-08-06 11:24 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai :
>> > At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:10:27 +0200,
>> > Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 2014-08-05 21:22 GMT+02:00 Shuah Khan :
>> >> > On Tue,
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:44:14 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
>
> 2014-08-06 11:24 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai :
> > At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:10:27 +0200,
> > Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> >>
> >> 2014-08-05 21:22 GMT+02:00 Shuah Khan :
> >> > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>
2014-08-06 11:24 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai :
> At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:10:27 +0200,
> Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
>>
>> 2014-08-05 21:22 GMT+02:00 Shuah Khan :
>> > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> >>> Yes, it worked, if the firmware was in the /lib/firmware directory.
>> >>
>>
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:10:27 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
>
> 2014-08-05 21:22 GMT+02:00 Shuah Khan :
> > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>> Yes, it worked, if the firmware was in the /lib/firmware directory.
> >>
> >
> > ok it works when the firmware is in
2014-08-05 21:22 GMT+02:00 Shuah Khan :
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>> Yes, it worked, if the firmware was in the /lib/firmware directory.
>>
>
> ok it works when the firmware is in /lib/firmware. It sounds to me the
> reason load fails when the firmware is under
2014-08-05 21:22 GMT+02:00 Shuah Khan shuahk...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de wrote:
Yes, it worked, if the firmware was in the /lib/firmware directory.
ok it works when the firmware is in /lib/firmware. It sounds to me the
reason load fails when the
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:10:27 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-05 21:22 GMT+02:00 Shuah Khan shuahk...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de wrote:
Yes, it worked, if the firmware was in the /lib/firmware directory.
ok it works when the
2014-08-06 11:24 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de:
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:10:27 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-05 21:22 GMT+02:00 Shuah Khan shuahk...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de wrote:
Yes, it worked, if the firmware was in the
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:44:14 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-06 11:24 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de:
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:10:27 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-05 21:22 GMT+02:00 Shuah Khan shuahk...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Takashi
2014-08-06 12:21 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de:
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:44:14 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-06 11:24 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de:
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:10:27 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-05 21:22 GMT+02:00 Shuah Khan
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 12:50:28 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-06 12:21 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de:
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:44:14 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-06 11:24 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de:
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:10:27 +0200,
2014-08-06 12:52 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de:
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 12:50:28 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-06 12:21 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de:
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:44:14 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-06 11:24 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:24:37 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-06 12:52 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de:
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 12:50:28 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-06 12:21 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de:
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:44:14 +0200,
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Jean-Michel Hautbois
jhautb...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-08-06 11:24 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de:
At Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:10:27 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-05 21:22 GMT+02:00 Shuah Khan shuahk...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:01 AM,
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> Yes, it worked, if the firmware was in the /lib/firmware directory.
>
ok it works when the firmware is in /lib/firmware. It sounds to me the
reason load fails when the firmware is under /sys/class/firmware is
fw_load_from_user_helper()
At Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:55:40 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
>
> 2014-08-05 17:53 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai :
> > At Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:43:17 +0200,
> > Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> >>
> >> 2014-08-01 22:01 GMT+02:00 :
> >> > Hi Takashi,
> >> >
> >> > Sorry for the late response, I tried with
2014-08-05 17:53 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai :
> At Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:43:17 +0200,
> Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
>>
>> 2014-08-01 22:01 GMT+02:00 :
>> > Hi Takashi,
>> >
>> > Sorry for the late response, I tried with latest stable kernel 3.15.8.
>> > surprisingly the BIOS update works even without
At Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:43:17 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
>
> 2014-08-01 22:01 GMT+02:00 :
> > Hi Takashi,
> >
> > Sorry for the late response, I tried with latest stable kernel 3.15.8.
> > surprisingly the BIOS update works even without applying the patch in both
> > the cases.
>
>
2014-08-01 22:01 GMT+02:00 :
> Hi Takashi,
>
> Sorry for the late response, I tried with latest stable kernel 3.15.8.
> surprisingly the BIOS update works even without applying the patch in both
> the cases.
Hi,I'm sorry for my late answer too, but I didn't try this patch recently...
I have
2014-08-01 22:01 GMT+02:00 b_b_si...@dell.com:
Hi Takashi,
Sorry for the late response, I tried with latest stable kernel 3.15.8.
surprisingly the BIOS update works even without applying the patch in both
the cases.
Hi,I'm sorry for my late answer too, but I didn't try this patch
At Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:43:17 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-01 22:01 GMT+02:00 b_b_si...@dell.com:
Hi Takashi,
Sorry for the late response, I tried with latest stable kernel 3.15.8.
surprisingly the BIOS update works even without applying the patch in both
the cases.
2014-08-05 17:53 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de:
At Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:43:17 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-01 22:01 GMT+02:00 b_b_si...@dell.com:
Hi Takashi,
Sorry for the late response, I tried with latest stable kernel 3.15.8.
surprisingly the BIOS update works
At Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:55:40 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-05 17:53 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de:
At Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:43:17 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2014-08-01 22:01 GMT+02:00 b_b_si...@dell.com:
Hi Takashi,
Sorry for the late response, I tried
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de wrote:
Yes, it worked, if the firmware was in the /lib/firmware directory.
ok it works when the firmware is in /lib/firmware. It sounds to me the
reason load fails when the firmware is under /sys/class/firmware is
Hi Takashi,
Sorry for the late response, I tried with latest stable kernel 3.15.8.
surprisingly the BIOS update works even without applying the patch in both the
cases.
Case I:
BIOS update is always successful with or without applying the patch
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/4/327, I don't
Hi Takashi,
Sorry for the late response, I tried with latest stable kernel 3.15.8.
surprisingly the BIOS update works even without applying the patch in both the
cases.
Case I:
BIOS update is always successful with or without applying the patch
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/4/327, I don't
Sorry Greg,
Here is the patch which I was referring to https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/4/327
I was doing the BIOS update test using the DELL BIOS-DUP's with the above patch.
Will provide you more technical analysis on why it is failing by tomorrow.
Regards
Balaji Singh
-Original Message-
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:10:01PM +0530, b_b_si...@dell.com wrote:
> Resending the mail..
>
> Hi All,
>
> As I communicated earlier the test never passed with older BIOS DUPs.
That test? What patch? Please be explicit, I deal with thousands of
patches and have no short term memory...
>
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:10:01PM +0530, b_b_si...@dell.com wrote:
Resending the mail..
Hi All,
As I communicated earlier the test never passed with older BIOS DUPs.
That test? What patch? Please be explicit, I deal with thousands of
patches and have no short term memory...
Again
Sorry Greg,
Here is the patch which I was referring to https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/4/327
I was doing the BIOS update test using the DELL BIOS-DUP's with the above patch.
Will provide you more technical analysis on why it is failing by tomorrow.
Regards
Balaji Singh
-Original Message-
38 matches
Mail list logo