"Grover, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> - It's probably easier to put the "event" file in proc, instead of
> dev. This is what the acpi interface does, and eliminates the mknod
> step.
Is this kernel policy? I mean, you could apply the same argument to
all device nodes ;-)
> -
Grover, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
- It's probably easier to put the event file in proc, instead of
dev. This is what the acpi interface does, and eliminates the mknod
step.
Is this kernel policy? I mean, you could apply the same argument to
all device nodes ;-)
- perhaps
[trimming CC's. Recommend [EMAIL PROTECTED] for followups]
As you mentioned, the ACPI driver does something similar, and I think the
approach is generally sound (or at least we haven't been able to come up
with anything better ;-) I do have the following comments:
- It's probably easier to put
[trimming CC's. Recommend [EMAIL PROTECTED] for followups]
As you mentioned, the ACPI driver does something similar, and I think the
approach is generally sound (or at least we haven't been able to come up
with anything better ;-) I do have the following comments:
- It's probably easier to put
4 matches
Mail list logo
