Re: RFC: Remove swap file support

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Since you can make any file into a block device using loop, > is there any value to supporting swap files in 2.5? > swap files seem like a special case that is no longer necessary... loop is always tricky re near-OOM deadlocks. It'll survive now, by

RFC: Remove swap file support

Since you can make any file into a block device using loop, is there any value to supporting swap files in 2.5? swap files seem like a special case that is no longer necessary... -- Jeff Garzik | A recent study has shown that too much soup Building 1024| can cause malaise in

RFC: Remove swap file support

Since you can make any file into a block device using loop, is there any value to supporting swap files in 2.5? swap files seem like a special case that is no longer necessary... -- Jeff Garzik | A recent study has shown that too much soup Building 1024| can cause malaise in

Re: RFC: Remove swap file support

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Since you can make any file into a block device using loop, is there any value to supporting swap files in 2.5? swap files seem like a special case that is no longer necessary... loop is always tricky re near-OOM deadlocks. It'll survive now, by