On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 06:08:55 +0100
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - History has shown that often the dependency on EXPERIMENTAL is not
> removed when the code has proven usable.
Guilty as charged. Feel free to kill any references to experimental for sdhci.
(I also support the
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 06:08:55 +0100
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- History has shown that often the dependency on EXPERIMENTAL is not
removed when the code has proven usable.
Guilty as charged. Feel free to kill any references to experimental for sdhci.
(I also support the general
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I'm about to send a patch that removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all
> dependencies on EXPERIMENTAL because they are pointless.
FWIW, I agree.
[...]
> As an example, is our NFSv4 support really still in an
> "alpha-test phase" [1], or is it already ready for being
Adrian Bunk wrote:
I'm about to send a patch that removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all
dependencies on EXPERIMENTAL because they are pointless.
FWIW, I agree.
[...]
As an example, is our NFSv4 support really still in an
alpha-test phase [1], or is it already ready for being used?
I'm about to send a patch that removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all
dependencies on EXPERIMENTAL because they are pointless.
Complete rationale:
- Many people and all distributions are currently forced to enable
CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL since the options for many device drivers depend
on
I'm about to send a patch that removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all
dependencies on EXPERIMENTAL because they are pointless.
Complete rationale:
- Many people and all distributions are currently forced to enable
CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL since the options for many device drivers depend
on
6 matches
Mail list logo
