H Paul,
On 17.02.2015 09:49, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 22:24 +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
The hpux code is broken anyway.
I'm going to remove it from the tree.
That happened in commit 04c161497716 ("parisc: hpux - Drop support for
HP-UX binaries"), which is included in today's
Hi Helge,
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 22:24 +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> The hpux code is broken anyway.
> I'm going to remove it from the tree.
That happened in commit 04c161497716 ("parisc: hpux - Drop support for
HP-UX binaries"), which is included in today's linux-next
(next-20150217). I noticed
H Paul,
On 17.02.2015 09:49, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 22:24 +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
The hpux code is broken anyway.
I'm going to remove it from the tree.
That happened in commit 04c161497716 (parisc: hpux - Drop support for
HP-UX binaries), which is included in today's
Hi Helge,
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 22:24 +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
The hpux code is broken anyway.
I'm going to remove it from the tree.
That happened in commit 04c161497716 (parisc: hpux - Drop support for
HP-UX binaries), which is included in today's linux-next
(next-20150217). I noticed
Hello Nicholas,
On 03.02.2015 10:37, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
scanning for if STATEMENT else STATEMENT triggered here - and it does look
like it needs a fix-up or at least some comments.
The if-else here has no effect and the printk will not convey any information
as its always
Hello Nicholas,
On 03.02.2015 10:37, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
scanning for if STATEMENT else STATEMENT triggered here - and it does look
like it needs a fix-up or at least some comments.
snip?
int hpux_sysfs(int opcode, unsigned long arg1, unsigned long arg2)
{
int fstype;
6 matches
Mail list logo
