Hi all,
>
> Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28
>
> Full patch:
> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-
> rsdl-0.28.patch
>
> Series:
> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/
>
> The patch to get you from 0.26 to 0.28:
>
On 3/11/07, Thibaut VARENE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/11/07, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone had any trouble with RSDL on the stable kernels (ie not -mm)?
Tested fine so far on ppc, ia64 and (mostly) parisc.
I meant ppc64, actually.
Gomen.
--
Thibaut VARENE
On 3/11/07, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone had any trouble with RSDL on the stable kernels (ie not -mm)?
Tested fine so far on ppc, ia64 and (mostly) parisc.
HTH
--
Thibaut VARENE
http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Sunday 11 March 2007 06:11, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:09:35PM -0500, Stephen Clark wrote:
> > Con Kolivas wrote:
> > >Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28
> > >
> > >Full patch:
> > >http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-rsdl-0.28.
> >
On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 04:56:57PM -0500, michael chang wrote:
> On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >BTW, Con, I think that you should base your work on 2.6.20.[23] and not
> >2.6.20 next time, due to this conflict. It will
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 04:56:57PM -0500, michael chang wrote:
> On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >BTW, Con, I think that you should base your work on 2.6.20.[23] and not
> >2.6.20 next time, due to this conflict. It will get wider adoption.
^^
> Maybe I'm
On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW, Con, I think that you should base your work on 2.6.20.[23] and not
2.6.20 next time, due to this conflict. It will get wider adoption.
Maybe I'm naive, but I find this hard to understand -- 2.6.20.2 didn't
exist when Con published his
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:09:35PM -0500, Stephen Clark wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
>
> >Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28
> >
> >Full patch:
> >http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-rsdl-0.28.patch
> >
> >Series:
>
Hi all,
>
> Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28
>
> Full patch:
> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-
> rsdl-0.28.patch
>
> Series:
> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/
>
> The patch to get you from 0.26 to 0.28:
>
Con Kolivas wrote:
Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28
Full patch:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-rsdl-0.28.patch
Series:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/
The patch to get you from 0.26 to 0.28:
Con Kolivas wrote:
Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28
Full patch:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-rsdl-0.28.patch
Series:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/
The patch to get you from 0.26 to 0.28:
Hi all,
Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28
Full patch:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-
rsdl-0.28.patch
Series:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/
The patch to get you from 0.26 to 0.28:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:09:35PM -0500, Stephen Clark wrote:
Con Kolivas wrote:
Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28
Full patch:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-rsdl-0.28.patch
Series:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/
The
On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, Con, I think that you should base your work on 2.6.20.[23] and not
2.6.20 next time, due to this conflict. It will get wider adoption.
Maybe I'm naive, but I find this hard to understand -- 2.6.20.2 didn't
exist when Con published his
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 04:56:57PM -0500, michael chang wrote:
On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, Con, I think that you should base your work on 2.6.20.[23] and not
2.6.20 next time, due to this conflict. It will get wider adoption.
^^
Maybe I'm naive,
On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 04:56:57PM -0500, michael chang wrote:
On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, Con, I think that you should base your work on 2.6.20.[23] and not
2.6.20 next time, due to this conflict. It will get
On Sunday 11 March 2007 06:11, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:09:35PM -0500, Stephen Clark wrote:
Con Kolivas wrote:
Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28
Full patch:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-rsdl-0.28.
patch
Series:
On 3/11/07, Con Kolivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone had any trouble with RSDL on the stable kernels (ie not -mm)?
Tested fine so far on ppc, ia64 and (mostly) parisc.
HTH
--
Thibaut VARENE
http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On 3/11/07, Thibaut VARENE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/11/07, Con Kolivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone had any trouble with RSDL on the stable kernels (ie not -mm)?
Tested fine so far on ppc, ia64 and (mostly) parisc.
I meant ppc64, actually.
Gomen.
--
Thibaut VARENE
Hi all,
Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28
Full patch:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-
rsdl-0.28.patch
Series:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/
The patch to get you from 0.26 to 0.28:
Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28
Full patch:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-rsdl-0.28.patch
Series:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/
The patch to get you from 0.26 to 0.28:
Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28
Full patch:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-rsdl-0.28.patch
Series:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/
The patch to get you from 0.26 to 0.28:
22 matches
Mail list logo
