On 30-11-2007 00:03, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Friday November 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
>> Or have I just not had enough coffee this morning?
>
> :-) And I cannot even blame the lack of coffee as I don't drink it.
>
Looks like logical error...
(Or I haven't had enough coffee this morning
On 30-11-2007 00:03, Neil Brown wrote:
On Friday November 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Or have I just not had enough coffee this morning?
:-) And I cannot even blame the lack of coffee as I don't drink it.
Looks like logical error...
(Or I haven't had enough coffee this morning
On Friday November 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:07:06AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> >
> > Hi David,
> >
> > On Friday November 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I came across this because I've been making changes to XFS to avoid the
> > > inode hash,
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:07:06AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> On Friday November 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> > I came across this because I've been making changes to XFS to avoid the
> > inode hash, and I've found that I need to remove the inode from the
> > dirty
Hi David,
On Friday November 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> I came across this because I've been making changes to XFS to avoid the
> inode hash, and I've found that I need to remove the inode from the
> dirty list when setting I_WILL_FREE to avoid this race. I can't see
> how this race is
If we are in the process of dropping an inode and it is hashed,
generic_forget_inode() will mark it I_WILL_FREE and drop the
inode_lock before calling write_inode_now().
However, at this point, the inode is still on the sb->s_dirty_list
so sync_sb_inodes() could see it and try to write it back.
If we are in the process of dropping an inode and it is hashed,
generic_forget_inode() will mark it I_WILL_FREE and drop the
inode_lock before calling write_inode_now().
However, at this point, the inode is still on the sb-s_dirty_list
so sync_sb_inodes() could see it and try to write it back.
Hi David,
On Friday November 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I came across this because I've been making changes to XFS to avoid the
inode hash, and I've found that I need to remove the inode from the
dirty list when setting I_WILL_FREE to avoid this race. I can't see
how this race is
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:07:06AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
Hi David,
On Friday November 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I came across this because I've been making changes to XFS to avoid the
inode hash, and I've found that I need to remove the inode from the
dirty list when
On Friday November 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:07:06AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
Hi David,
On Friday November 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I came across this because I've been making changes to XFS to avoid the
inode hash, and I've found that I
10 matches
Mail list logo