Re: + mm-oom-avoid-printk-iteration-under-rcu.patch added to -mm tree

[ups, I've cut the Cc list somehow, sorry about that] On Wed 24-07-19 08:27:27, Michal Hocko wrote: > Andrew, > I've had some concerns wrt. this patch - especially the additional > complexity - and I have to say I am not convinced that this is really > needed. Our past experience in this area

Re: + mm-oom-avoid-printk-iteration-under-rcu.patch added to -mm tree

Andrew, I've had some concerns wrt. this patch - especially the additional complexity - and I have to say I am not convinced that this is really needed. Our past experience in this area suggests that more tricky code leads to different corner cases. So I am really reluctant to add more complexity