On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
> On 10/19/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On my main devel box, vanilla 2.6.23 on x86-64/Fedora-7, I'm seeing a
> > certain behavior at least once a day. I'll start a kernel build (make
> > -sj5 on this box), and it will "hang" in the following
From: Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:59:14 -0400
> IIRC -mm had something like this but it was buggy because we were
> sending IPIs to each processor asking them to print their state.
What's buggy about this? :-) That's exactly how it work(ed)
on sparc64.
-
To
On 21/10/2007, Dmitry Adamushko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20/10/2007, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > > On 10/19/2007 05:39 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >> On my main devel box, vanilla 2.6.23 on x86-64/Fedora-7, I'm seeing a
> > >> certain behavior at least
On 20/10/2007, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > On 10/19/2007 05:39 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> On my main devel box, vanilla 2.6.23 on x86-64/Fedora-7, I'm seeing a
> >> certain behavior at least once a day. I'll start a kernel build (make
> >> -sj5 on this box),
On 10/19/2007 08:01 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> What might be appropriate is just to get a one-line program counter
> dump on every cpu via some new sysrq keystroke.
>
IIRC -mm had something like this but it was buggy because we were
sending IPIs to each processor asking them to print their
On 10/19/2007 08:01 PM, David Miller wrote:
What might be appropriate is just to get a one-line program counter
dump on every cpu via some new sysrq keystroke.
IIRC -mm had something like this but it was buggy because we were
sending IPIs to each processor asking them to print their state.
On 20/10/2007, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 10/19/2007 05:39 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On my main devel box, vanilla 2.6.23 on x86-64/Fedora-7, I'm seeing a
certain behavior at least once a day. I'll start a kernel build (make
-sj5 on this box), and it will
On 21/10/2007, Dmitry Adamushko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/10/2007, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 10/19/2007 05:39 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On my main devel box, vanilla 2.6.23 on x86-64/Fedora-7, I'm seeing a
certain behavior at least once a day. I'll
From: Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:59:14 -0400
IIRC -mm had something like this but it was buggy because we were
sending IPIs to each processor asking them to print their state.
What's buggy about this? :-) That's exactly how it work(ed)
on sparc64.
-
To
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
On 10/19/07, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On my main devel box, vanilla 2.6.23 on x86-64/Fedora-7, I'm seeing a
certain behavior at least once a day. I'll start a kernel build (make
-sj5 on this box), and it will hang in the following way:
On 10/19/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On my main devel box, vanilla 2.6.23 on x86-64/Fedora-7, I'm seeing a
> certain behavior at least once a day. I'll start a kernel build (make
> -sj5 on this box), and it will "hang" in the following way:
>
> > 31003 ?S 0:04 sshd:
From: Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:18:08 -0400
> On 10/19/2007 06:03 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] misc-2.6]$ strace -p8484
> >> Process 8484 attached - interrupt to quit
> > [sits there, chewing up CPU grepping a 47-line header file]
> >
>
> And
On 10/19/2007 06:03 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] misc-2.6]$ strace -p8484
>> Process 8484 attached - interrupt to quit
> [sits there, chewing up CPU grepping a 47-line header file]
>
And sysrq-p is pretty useless unless you can force the keyboard
interrupt and the spinning process
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 10/19/2007 05:39 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On my main devel box, vanilla 2.6.23 on x86-64/Fedora-7, I'm seeing a
certain behavior at least once a day. I'll start a kernel build (make
-sj5 on this box), and it will "hang" in the following way:
Can you try to strace the
On 10/19/2007 05:39 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On my main devel box, vanilla 2.6.23 on x86-64/Fedora-7, I'm seeing a
> certain behavior at least once a day. I'll start a kernel build (make
> -sj5 on this box), and it will "hang" in the following way:
>
Can you try to strace the hanging task?
-
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 10/19/2007 05:39 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On my main devel box, vanilla 2.6.23 on x86-64/Fedora-7, I'm seeing a
certain behavior at least once a day. I'll start a kernel build (make
-sj5 on this box), and it will hang in the following way:
Can you try to strace the
On 10/19/2007 05:39 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On my main devel box, vanilla 2.6.23 on x86-64/Fedora-7, I'm seeing a
certain behavior at least once a day. I'll start a kernel build (make
-sj5 on this box), and it will hang in the following way:
Can you try to strace the hanging task?
-
To
From: Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:18:08 -0400
On 10/19/2007 06:03 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] misc-2.6]$ strace -p8484
Process 8484 attached - interrupt to quit
[sits there, chewing up CPU grepping a 47-line header file]
And sysrq-p is pretty
On 10/19/2007 06:03 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] misc-2.6]$ strace -p8484
Process 8484 attached - interrupt to quit
[sits there, chewing up CPU grepping a 47-line header file]
And sysrq-p is pretty useless unless you can force the keyboard
interrupt and the spinning process onto
On 10/19/07, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On my main devel box, vanilla 2.6.23 on x86-64/Fedora-7, I'm seeing a
certain behavior at least once a day. I'll start a kernel build (make
-sj5 on this box), and it will hang in the following way:
31003 ?S 0:04 sshd: [EMAIL
20 matches
Mail list logo
