On 9/18/18 2:58 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 18-09-18 02:35:43, Jann Horn wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:05 AM Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> Thanks for CC Hugh.
>
>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, Jann Horn wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Makes sense, I guess.
>>
>> I wonder whether there's a concise way to express
On 9/18/18 2:58 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 18-09-18 02:35:43, Jann Horn wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:05 AM Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> Thanks for CC Hugh.
>
>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, Jann Horn wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Makes sense, I guess.
>>
>> I wonder whether there's a concise way to express
On Tue 18-09-18 02:35:43, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:05 AM Hugh Dickins wrote:
Thanks for CC Hugh.
> > On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, Jann Horn wrote:
> >
> > > [I'm not sure who the best people to ask about this are, I hope the
> > > recipient list resembles something reasonable...]
>
On Tue 18-09-18 02:35:43, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:05 AM Hugh Dickins wrote:
Thanks for CC Hugh.
> > On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, Jann Horn wrote:
> >
> > > [I'm not sure who the best people to ask about this are, I hope the
> > > recipient list resembles something reasonable...]
>
On 18.09.2018 03:35, Jann Horn wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:05 AM Hugh Dickins wrote:
Hi Jann,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, Jann Horn wrote:
[I'm not sure who the best people to ask about this are, I hope the
recipient list resembles something reasonable...]
I have noticed that the dup_mmap()
On 18.09.2018 03:35, Jann Horn wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:05 AM Hugh Dickins wrote:
Hi Jann,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, Jann Horn wrote:
[I'm not sure who the best people to ask about this are, I hope the
recipient list resembles something reasonable...]
I have noticed that the dup_mmap()
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:05 AM Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> Hi Jann,
>
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, Jann Horn wrote:
>
> > [I'm not sure who the best people to ask about this are, I hope the
> > recipient list resembles something reasonable...]
> >
> > I have noticed that the dup_mmap() logic on fork()
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:05 AM Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> Hi Jann,
>
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, Jann Horn wrote:
>
> > [I'm not sure who the best people to ask about this are, I hope the
> > recipient list resembles something reasonable...]
> >
> > I have noticed that the dup_mmap() logic on fork()
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:05 PM Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> Hi Jann,
>
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, Jann Horn wrote:
>
> > [I'm not sure who the best people to ask about this are, I hope the
> > recipient list resembles something reasonable...]
> >
> > I have noticed that the dup_mmap() logic on fork()
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:05 PM Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> Hi Jann,
>
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, Jann Horn wrote:
>
> > [I'm not sure who the best people to ask about this are, I hope the
> > recipient list resembles something reasonable...]
> >
> > I have noticed that the dup_mmap() logic on fork()
Hi Jann,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, Jann Horn wrote:
> [I'm not sure who the best people to ask about this are, I hope the
> recipient list resembles something reasonable...]
>
> I have noticed that the dup_mmap() logic on fork() doesn't handle
> pages with active direct I/O properly: dup_mmap()
Hi Jann,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, Jann Horn wrote:
> [I'm not sure who the best people to ask about this are, I hope the
> recipient list resembles something reasonable...]
>
> I have noticed that the dup_mmap() logic on fork() doesn't handle
> pages with active direct I/O properly: dup_mmap()
12 matches
Mail list logo