On 2005-07-20T11:39:38, Joel Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In turn, let me clarify a little where configfs fits in to
> things. Configfs is merely a convenient and transparent method to
> communicate configuration to kernel objects. It's not a place for
> uevents, for netlink
On 2005-07-20T11:39:38, Joel Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In turn, let me clarify a little where configfs fits in to
things. Configfs is merely a convenient and transparent method to
communicate configuration to kernel objects. It's not a place for
uevents, for netlink sockets, or
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:09:18PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2005-07-20T09:55:31, "Walker, Bruce J (HP-Labs)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Like Lars, I too was under the wrong impression about this configfs
> > "nodemanager" kernel component. Our discussions in the cluster
> >
On 2005-07-20T09:55:31, "Walker, Bruce J (HP-Labs)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Like Lars, I too was under the wrong impression about this configfs
> "nodemanager" kernel component. Our discussions in the cluster
> meeting Monday and Tuesday were assuming it was a general service that
> other
On 2005-07-20T09:55:31, Walker, Bruce J (HP-Labs) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like Lars, I too was under the wrong impression about this configfs
nodemanager kernel component. Our discussions in the cluster
meeting Monday and Tuesday were assuming it was a general service that
other kernel
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:09:18PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2005-07-20T09:55:31, Walker, Bruce J (HP-Labs) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like Lars, I too was under the wrong impression about this configfs
nodemanager kernel component. Our discussions in the cluster
meeting Monday
6 matches
Mail list logo
