Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi updates for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-15 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 13:25 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Okay, so du -s is: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# du -sh /tmp/delme.git/ > 109M/tmp/delme.git/ > > Not as bad as I expected, but still quite a lot of data for few > changes. Erm, but that's why it's an rsync archive. You're supposed to

Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi updates for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > This is a small set of bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2 ... you asked me to try > > git, so I did (I actually updated my bk backport script simply to export > > from a BK tree to a git tree). For the time being, I plan to keep the > > scsi changes in BK, but I'll export them for you to try

Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi updates for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > This is a small set of bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2 ... you asked me to try > git, so I did (I actually updated my bk backport script simply to export > from a BK tree to a git tree). For the time being, I plan to keep the > scsi changes in BK, but I'll export them for you to try merging > >

Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi updates for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! This is a small set of bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2 ... you asked me to try git, so I did (I actually updated my bk backport script simply to export from a BK tree to a git tree). For the time being, I plan to keep the scsi changes in BK, but I'll export them for you to try merging The

Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi updates for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! This is a small set of bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2 ... you asked me to try git, so I did (I actually updated my bk backport script simply to export from a BK tree to a git tree). For the time being, I plan to keep the scsi changes in BK, but I'll export them for you to try merging

Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi updates for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-15 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 13:25 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: Okay, so du -s is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# du -sh /tmp/delme.git/ 109M/tmp/delme.git/ Not as bad as I expected, but still quite a lot of data for few changes. Erm, but that's why it's an rsync archive. You're supposed to have a