On 02/19/2013 01:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 02/19/2013 10:19 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 02/19/2013 12:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:47:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
My fault... I was
On 02/19/2013 10:19 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 02/19/2013 12:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:47:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread.
On 02/19/2013 12:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:47:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread.
The problem is that the fix is necessary but
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:57:27PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> CC-ing Boris.
Ah, the string after the "@" and before the ".com" is different now :-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:47:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread.
> >
> > The problem is that the fix is necessary but not sufficient, as it
> > introduces an
On 02/19/2013 09:47 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread.
The problem is that the fix is necessary but not sufficient, as it
introduces an undesirable host-guest dependency.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread.
>
> The problem is that the fix is necessary but not sufficient, as it
> introduces an undesirable host-guest dependency. In order to allow
> neerw guests to work on
On 02/19/2013 07:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Those kill a kvm guest with a #GP. Can we apply the fix for it too pls?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=136077007423065=2
Linus, please skip this pull request, we'll sort it out.
My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread.
* Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 04:25:03PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Linus,
> >
> > Please pull the latest x86-cpu-for-linus git tree from:
> >
> >git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
> > x86-cpu-for-linus
> >
> >HEAD:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 04:25:03PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Linus,
>
> Please pull the latest x86-cpu-for-linus git tree from:
>
>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86-cpu-for-linus
>
>HEAD: f0322bd341fd63261527bf84afd3272bcc2e8dd3 x86, AMD: Enable WC+ memory
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 04:25:03PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Linus,
Please pull the latest x86-cpu-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86-cpu-for-linus
HEAD: f0322bd341fd63261527bf84afd3272bcc2e8dd3 x86, AMD: Enable WC+ memory
type
* Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 04:25:03PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Linus,
Please pull the latest x86-cpu-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
x86-cpu-for-linus
HEAD:
On 02/19/2013 07:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Those kill a kvm guest with a #GP. Can we apply the fix for it too pls?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=136077007423065w=2
Linus, please skip this pull request, we'll sort it out.
My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread.
The problem is that the fix is necessary but not sufficient, as it
introduces an undesirable host-guest dependency. In order to allow
neerw guests to work on
On 02/19/2013 09:47 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread.
The problem is that the fix is necessary but not sufficient, as it
introduces an undesirable host-guest dependency.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:47:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread.
The problem is that the fix is necessary but not sufficient, as it
introduces an undesirable
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:57:27PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
CC-ing Boris.
Ah, the string after the @ and before the .com is different now :-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On 02/19/2013 12:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:47:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread.
The problem is that the fix is necessary but
On 02/19/2013 10:19 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 02/19/2013 12:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:47:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread.
On 02/19/2013 01:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 02/19/2013 10:19 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 02/19/2013 12:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:47:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
My fault... I was
20 matches
Mail list logo
