Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 10:32:04AM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Aaron Lu wrote: > > On 08/23/2016 05:44 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >> Em 19-08-2016 04:24, Aaron Lu escreveu: > >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:19:39AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 10:32:04AM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Aaron Lu wrote: > > On 08/23/2016 05:44 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >> Em 19-08-2016 04:24, Aaron Lu escreveu: > >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:19:39AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Aaron Lu wrote: > On 08/23/2016 05:44 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> Em 19-08-2016 04:24, Aaron Lu escreveu: >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:19:39AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: Hi, Em 19-08-2016 02:29, Aaron Lu

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Aaron Lu wrote: > On 08/23/2016 05:44 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> Em 19-08-2016 04:24, Aaron Lu escreveu: >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:19:39AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: Hi, Em 19-08-2016 02:29, Aaron Lu escreveu: ...

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On 08/23/2016 05:44 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Em 19-08-2016 04:24, Aaron Lu escreveu: >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:19:39AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Em 19-08-2016 02:29, Aaron Lu escreveu: >>> ... It doesn't look insane and sctp_wait_for_sndbuf may

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On 08/23/2016 05:44 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Em 19-08-2016 04:24, Aaron Lu escreveu: >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:19:39AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Em 19-08-2016 02:29, Aaron Lu escreveu: >>> ... It doesn't look insane and sctp_wait_for_sndbuf may

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On 08/23/2016 05:44 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Em 19-08-2016 04:24, Aaron Lu escreveu: >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:19:39AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Em 19-08-2016 02:29, Aaron Lu escreveu: >>> ... It doesn't look insane and sctp_wait_for_sndbuf may

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On 08/23/2016 05:44 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Em 19-08-2016 04:24, Aaron Lu escreveu: >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:19:39AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Em 19-08-2016 02:29, Aaron Lu escreveu: >>> ... It doesn't look insane and sctp_wait_for_sndbuf may

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

Em 19-08-2016 04:24, Aaron Lu escreveu: On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:19:39AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: Hi, Em 19-08-2016 02:29, Aaron Lu escreveu: ... It doesn't look insane and sctp_wait_for_sndbuf may actually have something to do with a larger sctp_chunk I suppose? The same perf

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

Em 19-08-2016 04:24, Aaron Lu escreveu: On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:19:39AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: Hi, Em 19-08-2016 02:29, Aaron Lu escreveu: ... It doesn't look insane and sctp_wait_for_sndbuf may actually have something to do with a larger sctp_chunk I suppose? The same perf

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:19:39AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Hi, > > Em 19-08-2016 02:29, Aaron Lu escreveu: > ... > > It doesn't look insane and sctp_wait_for_sndbuf may actually have > > something to do with a larger sctp_chunk I suppose? > > > > The same perf record doesn't

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:19:39AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Hi, > > Em 19-08-2016 02:29, Aaron Lu escreveu: > ... > > It doesn't look insane and sctp_wait_for_sndbuf may actually have > > something to do with a larger sctp_chunk I suppose? > > > > The same perf record doesn't

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

Hi, Em 19-08-2016 02:29, Aaron Lu escreveu: ... It doesn't look insane and sctp_wait_for_sndbuf may actually have something to do with a larger sctp_chunk I suppose? The same perf record doesn't capture any sample for the good commit, which suggests the nerperf process doesn't sleep in

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

Hi, Em 19-08-2016 02:29, Aaron Lu escreveu: ... It doesn't look insane and sctp_wait_for_sndbuf may actually have something to do with a larger sctp_chunk I suppose? The same perf record doesn't capture any sample for the good commit, which suggests the nerperf process doesn't sleep in

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 08:45:42PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > >> Hi, Aaron > >> > >> 1) > >> I talked with Marcelo about this one. > >> He said it might be related with cacheline. the new field distroyed > >> the prior cacheline. So on top of commit 826d253d57b1, pls only add > >> + unsigned

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 08:45:42PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > >> Hi, Aaron > >> > >> 1) > >> I talked with Marcelo about this one. > >> He said it might be related with cacheline. the new field distroyed > >> the prior cacheline. So on top of commit 826d253d57b1, pls only add > >> + unsigned

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

>> Hi, Aaron >> >> 1) >> I talked with Marcelo about this one. >> He said it might be related with cacheline. the new field distroyed >> the prior cacheline. So on top of commit 826d253d57b1, pls only add >> + unsigned long prsctp_param; >> >> to the end of struct sctp_chunk, then try. > >

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

>> Hi, Aaron >> >> 1) >> I talked with Marcelo about this one. >> He said it might be related with cacheline. the new field distroyed >> the prior cacheline. So on top of commit 826d253d57b1, pls only add >> + unsigned long prsctp_param; >> >> to the end of struct sctp_chunk, then try. > >

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 02:06:50AM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > > > > It doesn't seem memory is an issue. > > > > The whole dump is about the same. > > The MemFree and MemAvailable doesn't change much. > > > Hi, Aaron > > 1) > I talked with Marcelo about this one. > He said it might be related with

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 02:06:50AM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > > > > It doesn't seem memory is an issue. > > > > The whole dump is about the same. > > The MemFree and MemAvailable doesn't change much. > > > Hi, Aaron > > 1) > I talked with Marcelo about this one. > He said it might be related with

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

> > It doesn't seem memory is an issue. > > The whole dump is about the same. > The MemFree and MemAvailable doesn't change much. > Hi, Aaron 1) I talked with Marcelo about this one. He said it might be related with cacheline. the new field distroyed the prior cacheline. So on top of commit

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

> > It doesn't seem memory is an issue. > > The whole dump is about the same. > The MemFree and MemAvailable doesn't change much. > Hi, Aaron 1) I talked with Marcelo about this one. He said it might be related with cacheline. the new field distroyed the prior cacheline. So on top of commit

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On 08/17/2016 04:58 PM, Xin Long wrote: >> >> It doesn't change on my desktop Sandybridge. >> >> $ cat 4.7.0-rc6-01199-g116558d316e8/0/netperf.json >> { >> "netperf.Throughput_Mbps": [ >>748.205624998 >> ] >> } >> >> Where commit 116558d316e8 is based on top of the last test commit >>

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On 08/17/2016 04:58 PM, Xin Long wrote: >> >> It doesn't change on my desktop Sandybridge. >> >> $ cat 4.7.0-rc6-01199-g116558d316e8/0/netperf.json >> { >> "netperf.Throughput_Mbps": [ >>748.205624998 >> ] >> } >> >> Where commit 116558d316e8 is based on top of the last test commit >>

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

> > It doesn't change on my desktop Sandybridge. > > $ cat 4.7.0-rc6-01199-g116558d316e8/0/netperf.json > { > "netperf.Throughput_Mbps": [ >748.205624998 > ] > } > > Where commit 116558d316e8 is based on top of the last test commit > 98dd2532b14e with the sent_count removed. Nice job I

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

> > It doesn't change on my desktop Sandybridge. > > $ cat 4.7.0-rc6-01199-g116558d316e8/0/netperf.json > { > "netperf.Throughput_Mbps": [ >748.205624998 > ] > } > > Where commit 116558d316e8 is based on top of the last test commit > 98dd2532b14e with the sent_count removed. Nice job I

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 04:02:45PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > >> you mean only this two line: > >>> + unsigned long prsctp_param; > >>> + int sent_count;ca; > >> > >> caused the performance issue ? > > > > Right. > OK, can you remove this line from your patch > + int sent_count; >

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 04:02:45PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > >> you mean only this two line: > >>> + unsigned long prsctp_param; > >>> + int sent_count;ca; > >> > >> caused the performance issue ? > > > > Right. > OK, can you remove this line from your patch > + int sent_count; >

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

>> you mean only this two line: >>> + unsigned long prsctp_param; >>> + int sent_count;ca; >> >> caused the performance issue ? > > Right. OK, can you remove this line from your patch + int sent_count; then test again, thanks.

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

>> you mean only this two line: >>> + unsigned long prsctp_param; >>> + int sent_count;ca; >> >> caused the performance issue ? > > Right. OK, can you remove this line from your patch + int sent_count; then test again, thanks.

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 03:42:34PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote: > On 08/17/2016 03:35 PM, Xin Long wrote: > >> include/net/sctp/structs.h | 3 +++ > >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h > >> index d8e464aacb20..932f2780d3a4

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 03:42:34PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote: > On 08/17/2016 03:35 PM, Xin Long wrote: > >> include/net/sctp/structs.h | 3 +++ > >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h > >> index d8e464aacb20..932f2780d3a4

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On 08/17/2016 03:35 PM, Xin Long wrote: >> include/net/sctp/structs.h | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h >> index d8e464aacb20..932f2780d3a4 100644 >> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h >> +++

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On 08/17/2016 03:35 PM, Xin Long wrote: >> include/net/sctp/structs.h | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h >> index d8e464aacb20..932f2780d3a4 100644 >> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h >> +++

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

> include/net/sctp/structs.h | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h > index d8e464aacb20..932f2780d3a4 100644 > --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h > +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h > @@ -602,6 +602,9 @@ struct sctp_chunk

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

> include/net/sctp/structs.h | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h > index d8e464aacb20..932f2780d3a4 100644 > --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h > +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h > @@ -602,6 +602,9 @@ struct sctp_chunk

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 02:37:19PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 02:14:05PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:41:04PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > > > > The perf-profile data for the two commits are attached(for the case of > > > > prsctp_enable=1, the

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 02:37:19PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 02:14:05PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:41:04PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > > > > The perf-profile data for the two commits are attached(for the case of > > > > prsctp_enable=1, the

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 02:14:05PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:41:04PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > > > The perf-profile data for the two commits are attached(for the case of > > > prsctp_enable=1, the perf-profile data doesn't get collected for the 0 > > > case for some

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 02:14:05PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:41:04PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > > > The perf-profile data for the two commits are attached(for the case of > > > prsctp_enable=1, the perf-profile data doesn't get collected for the 0 > > > case for some

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:41:04PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > > The perf-profile data for the two commits are attached(for the case of > > prsctp_enable=1, the perf-profile data doesn't get collected for the 0 > > case for some reason, I'm checking the problem now). > > > > The CPU gets much more

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:41:04PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > > The perf-profile data for the two commits are attached(for the case of > > prsctp_enable=1, the perf-profile data doesn't get collected for the 0 > > case for some reason, I'm checking the problem now). > > > > The CPU gets much more

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

> The perf-profile data for the two commits are attached(for the case of > prsctp_enable=1, the perf-profile data doesn't get collected for the 0 > case for some reason, I'm checking the problem now). > > The CPU gets much more idle time in the bisected commit a6c2f79287: > > 68.89% 0.70%

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

> The perf-profile data for the two commits are attached(for the case of > prsctp_enable=1, the perf-profile data doesn't get collected for the 0 > case for some reason, I'm checking the problem now). > > The CPU gets much more idle time in the bisected commit a6c2f79287: > > 68.89% 0.70%

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On 08/17/2016 01:04 PM, Aaron Lu wrote: > On 08/16/2016 05:56 PM, Xin Long wrote: > > I'm testing on Linus' master, can we all use that please? > [git] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git [mechine] Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On 08/17/2016 01:04 PM, Aaron Lu wrote: > On 08/16/2016 05:56 PM, Xin Long wrote: > > I'm testing on Linus' master, can we all use that please? > [git] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git [mechine] Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

> > For commit a6c2f79287 ("sctp: implement prsctp TTL policy"), no matter > the value of net.sctp.prsctp_enable, the throughput is almost the same: > > net.sctp.prsctp_enable = 0 > { > "netperf.Throughput_Mbps": [ > 2353.311249997 > ] > } > > net.sctp.prsctp_enable = 1 > { >

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

> > For commit a6c2f79287 ("sctp: implement prsctp TTL policy"), no matter > the value of net.sctp.prsctp_enable, the throughput is almost the same: > > net.sctp.prsctp_enable = 0 > { > "netperf.Throughput_Mbps": [ > 2353.311249997 > ] > } > > net.sctp.prsctp_enable = 1 > { >

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On 08/16/2016 05:56 PM, Xin Long wrote: I'm testing on Linus' master, can we all use that please? >>> >>> [git] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git >>> >>> [mechine] >>> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz >>> mem 62G (66000220K) >>> >>> [system]

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On 08/16/2016 05:56 PM, Xin Long wrote: I'm testing on Linus' master, can we all use that please? >>> >>> [git] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git >>> >>> [mechine] >>> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz >>> mem 62G (66000220K) >>> >>> [system]

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

> > And I think we should be doing test on: > commit a6c2f79287 ("sctp: implement prsctp TTL policy") (the bisected one) > and > commit 826d253d57 ("sctp: add SCTP_PR_ASSOC_STATUS on sctp sockopt") (its > immediate parent) > instead of Linus' master HEAD to avoid other factors. > The test result

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

> > And I think we should be doing test on: > commit a6c2f79287 ("sctp: implement prsctp TTL policy") (the bisected one) > and > commit 826d253d57 ("sctp: add SCTP_PR_ASSOC_STATUS on sctp sockopt") (its > immediate parent) > instead of Linus' master HEAD to avoid other factors. > The test result

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

>>> >>> I'm testing on Linus' master, can we all use that please? >>> >> >> [git] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git >> >> [mechine] >> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz >> mem 62G (66000220K) >> >> [system] >> # cat /etc/redhat-release >> Red Hat Enterprise

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

>>> >>> I'm testing on Linus' master, can we all use that please? >>> >> >> [git] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git >> >> [mechine] >> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz >> mem 62G (66000220K) >> >> [system] >> # cat /etc/redhat-release >> Red Hat Enterprise

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On 08/16/2016 04:02 PM, Xin Long wrote: >> >> I'm testing on Linus' master, can we all use that please? >> > > [git] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > > [mechine] > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz > mem 62G (66000220K) > > [system] > # cat

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On 08/16/2016 04:02 PM, Xin Long wrote: >> >> I'm testing on Linus' master, can we all use that please? >> > > [git] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > > [mechine] > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz > mem 62G (66000220K) > > [system] > # cat

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On 08/16/2016 04:02 PM, Xin Long wrote: >> >> I'm testing on Linus' master, can we all use that please? >> > > [git] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > > [mechine] > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz > mem 62G (66000220K) > > [system] > # cat

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On 08/16/2016 04:02 PM, Xin Long wrote: >> >> I'm testing on Linus' master, can we all use that please? >> > > [git] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > > [mechine] > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz > mem 62G (66000220K) > > [system] > # cat

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

> > I'm testing on Linus' master, can we all use that please? > [git] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git [mechine] Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz mem 62G (66000220K) [system] # cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.3 Beta

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

> > I'm testing on Linus' master, can we all use that please? > [git] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git [mechine] Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz mem 62G (66000220K) [system] # cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.3 Beta

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

Any update on this, Long? Regards, Aaron On 08/08/2016 10:10 AM, Aaron Lu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 07:53:38PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: It doesn't make much sense to me. the codes I added cannot be triggered without enable any pr policies. and I also did the tests in >>> >>> It

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

Any update on this, Long? Regards, Aaron On 08/08/2016 10:10 AM, Aaron Lu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 07:53:38PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: It doesn't make much sense to me. the codes I added cannot be triggered without enable any pr policies. and I also did the tests in >>> >>> It

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 07:53:38PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > >> It doesn't make much sense to me. the codes I added cannot be > >> triggered without enable any pr policies. and I also did the tests in > > > > It seems these pr policies has to be turned on by user space, i.e. > > netperf in this

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 07:53:38PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > >> It doesn't make much sense to me. the codes I added cannot be > >> triggered without enable any pr policies. and I also did the tests in > > > > It seems these pr policies has to be turned on by user space, i.e. > > netperf in this

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

>> It doesn't make much sense to me. the codes I added cannot be >> triggered without enable any pr policies. and I also did the tests in > > It seems these pr policies has to be turned on by user space, i.e. > netperf in this case? > > I checked netperf's source code, it doesn't seem set any

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

>> It doesn't make much sense to me. the codes I added cannot be >> triggered without enable any pr policies. and I also did the tests in > > It seems these pr policies has to be turned on by user space, i.e. > netperf in this case? > > I checked netperf's source code, it doesn't seem set any

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:01:36PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 9:54 AM, kernel test robot > wrote: > > > > FYI, we noticed a -37.2% regression of netperf.Throughput_Mbps due to > > commit: > > > > commit a6c2f792873aff332a4689717c3cd6104f46684c ("sctp:

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:01:36PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 9:54 AM, kernel test robot > wrote: > > > > FYI, we noticed a -37.2% regression of netperf.Throughput_Mbps due to > > commit: > > > > commit a6c2f792873aff332a4689717c3cd6104f46684c ("sctp: implement prsctp > >